Rabies Virus in Wildlife Reservoirs

Overview and Taxonomy of Rabies Virus in Wildlife Reservoirs

Rabies virus (RABV) is the prototypical member of the genus Lyssavirus within the family Rhabdoviridae, order Mononegavirales [1, 6, 9]. As a neurotropic, enveloped, single-stranded negative-sense RNA virus, RABV exhibits a bullet-shaped morphology characteristic of rhabdoviruses and possesses a genome of approximately 12 kilobases encoding five structural proteins: nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), glycoprotein (G), and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L) [9, 27]. The glycoprotein, which forms trimeric spikes on the viral envelope, is the primary antigenic determinant responsible for inducing virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNAs) and is a critical target for vaccine development [11, 15, 31]. The nucleoprotein, while internal, is the principal antigen employed in diagnostic immunofluorescence assays and forms the basis for much of the phylogenetic classification of RABV variants globally [7, 9, 24].

Taxonomically, RABV is but one of at least 16 recognized lyssavirus species, including among others Lagos bat virus, Mokola virus, Duvenhage virus, European bat lyssaviruses types 1 and 2, Australian bat lyssavirus, and the more recently identified Irkut virus and Khujand virus [9, 22, 27]. However, RABV remains the most globally significant lyssavirus, being the only one circulating extensively in both terrestrial carnivore and bat reservoirs across the Americas, Asia, Africa, and parts of Europe [1, 9, 13]. The World Health Organization (WHO), the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) all recognize RABV as the predominant zoonotic lyssavirus, responsible for an estimated 59,000–60,000 human deaths annually, with the vast majority occurring in resource-limited settings where canine rabies is endemic [1, 9, 12].

The genetic diversity of rabies virus is immense, driven by its error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and the vast ecological landscapes across which its reservoir hosts range [27]. Phylogenetic analyses of the nucleoprotein (N) gene have become the gold standard for delineating RABV variants, as this gene is sufficiently conserved for robust alignment yet variable enough to distinguish geographically and host-adapted lineages [7, 18, 24]. Globally, RABV isolates cluster into several major clades corresponding to their primary reservoir hosts and geographic origins. In the Americas, bat-borne RABV lineages represent an ancestral and highly diverse radiation, with evidence suggesting that Chiroptera may represent the original mammalian reservoir from which terrestrial carnivore RABV variants descended [7, 12, 27]. Conversely, most terrestrial carnivore RABV variants in the Americas, such as the raccoon variant circulating in eastern North America, the south-central skunk variant, and the Arctic fox variant, are believed to have originated from host-switching events from bats, followed by independent maintenance and evolution within specific carnivore guilds [5, 7, 20, 27].

In Europe, the predominant RABV variants circulating in wildlife are classified into the Central European and North-Eastern European lineages, both maintained primarily in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) [19, 24, 29]. The extensive oral rabies vaccination (ORV) programs coordinated across European Union member states have resulted in the elimination of these terrestrial variants from many countries, though sporadic incursions from endemic foci persist, particularly along the eastern borders of the EU adjacent to Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia [19, 24, 28, 29]. Molecular surveillance conducted in Poland between 2021 and 2023 revealed that 93.6% of isolates from wildlife were Central European strains, while a smaller proportion (5.7%) were North-Eastern European variants, highlighting the dynamic nature of variant distribution even within a single nation [24].

Across Asia, the landscape of RABV diversity is equally complex. In mainland China, wildlife-originated RABVs are phylogenetically distinct from local dog-originated viruses, clustering with older China clades II through V, suggesting that wildlife reservoirs have maintained independent transmission cycles for extended periods [22]. The Chinese ferret badger (Melogale moschata) has emerged as a particularly significant reservoir in southeastern China and Taiwan, where a unique and highly divergent clade of RABV has been identified [22, 32]. In Taiwan, phylogeographic analysis of ferret badger RABVs has demonstrated three distinct genotypes separated by natural ecological barriers, including major rivers and mountain ranges, underscoring the influence of host population structure on viral evolution [32]. In the Indian subcontinent and the Middle East, RABV variants circulate among dogs, foxes, jackals, and wolves, with genetic evidence indicating frequent cross-species transmission events between domestic and wild canids [6, 16, 23].

The concept of a "reservoir" in rabies virology is operationally defined as a species or ecological community in which a pathogen can be permanently maintained and from which infection is transmitted to other species [3, 4, 18]. For RABV, the primary reservoir orders are Carnivora and Chiroptera, with the CDC and WHO both recognizing that these two mammalian orders account for the overwhelming majority of global RABV maintenance and transmission [4, 9, 13]. However, not all species within these orders function as reservoirs; many are sporadic spillover hosts that do not support sustained onward transmission [3, 20]. A landmark trait-based analysis employing gradient boosting machine learning models identified key physiological and ecological features associated with reservoir competence in carnivores, including phylogenetic similarity to known reservoirs, larger litter sizes, and earlier sexual maturity [4]. For bats, geographic range, location in the Americas, and large litter size were the strongest predictors of reservoir status [4].

Critically, the maintenance of RABV within wildlife reservoirs is not a static phenomenon. Contemporary host shifting events are well-documented, whereby RABV variants adapt to novel host species, sometimes establishing new, independent transmission cycles [4, 7, 27]. Examples include the emergence of the south-central skunk variant in Colorado following decades of apparent absence [5, 20], the repeated incursions of raccoon rabies across the Appalachian Mountains and into previously rabies-free counties in Virginia [10, 21], and the detection of RABV in Eurasian badgers in Inner Mongolia, China, with 99.4% nucleotide identity to bovine-associated cosmopolitan lineages, indicating recent spillover from a wildlife reservoir into livestock [2]. Such events highlight the plasticity of RABV host adaptation and the necessity for ongoing surveillance at the wildlife-livestock-human interface [2, 3, 23].

The taxonomic classification of RABV variants by reservoir host species has profound implications for rabies control and prevention. Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) programs, which have been successfully deployed in Europe and North America, must be tailored to the target species, as vaccine efficacy varies markedly among different reservoir hosts [8, 15, 30]. For instance, striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) are considerably more refractory to oral vaccination than red foxes, requiring higher vaccine titers and exhibiting less efficient uptake through the palatine tonsils, which are critical inductive sites for mucosal immunity [30]. Similarly, the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata), which accounts for over 70% of animal rabies cases in Puerto Rico and is a reservoir on several Caribbean islands, presents unique challenges for ORV due to its dietary preferences and ecological niche [14, 25, 26]. Understanding the taxonomic and ecological diversity of RABV reservoirs, therefore, is not merely an academic exercise but a prerequisite for designing effective, species-specific intervention strategies that can achieve the global goal of eliminating dog-mediated human rabies by 2030, a target set by WHO, WOAH, FAO, and the Global Alliance for Rabies Control [11, 15, 17].

In summary, the taxonomy of rabies virus is intricately linked to its reservoir hosts, with distinct viral variants co-evolving within specific carnivore and bat populations across the globe. This host-adapted genetic structure, elucidated through decades of phylogenetic and phylogeographic research [7, 18, 24, 27], underscores the complexity of rabies as a multi-host pathogen and highlights the critical need for integrated, One Health-informed surveillance and control efforts that recognize the unique ecological and evolutionary dynamics of each reservoir system.

Molecular Pathogenesis of Rabies Virus in Reservoir Hosts

The molecular pathogenesis of rabies virus (RABV) in reservoir hosts represents a sophisticated interplay between a neurotropic pathogen and the unique physiological and immunological landscapes of its mammalian hosts. Understanding these mechanisms at the molecular level is critical for predicting spillover events, designing effective oral vaccination strategies, and interpreting the ecological persistence of RABV in wildlife populations. The pathogenesis involves a cascade of molecular events beginning at the site of inoculation, progressing through retrograde axonal transport, immune evasion within the central nervous system (CNS), and culminating in behavioral modification and salivary shedding that ensures onward transmission.

Molecular Mechanisms of Neuroinvasion and Axonal Transport

Following inoculation through the bite of an infected conspecific or interspecific contact, RABV initially replicates locally in striated muscle cells at the wound site [9]. The virus exploits the host cell's endocytic machinery to enter myocytes, where it undergoes primary replication. However, recent evidence from molecular studies indicates that the virus may also directly infect peripheral nerve endings without obligatory replication in muscle tissue, particularly when the inoculum is deposited directly into wound beds rich in neuronal termini [27, 28]. This direct neuroinvasion is mediated by the viral glycoprotein (G), which binds to specific neuronal receptors including the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), and the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) [9]. The G protein's receptor-binding domain facilitates pH-dependent membrane fusion after endocytosis, releasing the viral ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex into the neuronal cytoplasm.

The hallmark of RABV pathogenesis is its exclusively retrograde axonal transport within neurons. The RNP complex, consisting of the viral RNA genome encapsidated by the nucleoprotein (N) and associated with the phosphoprotein (P) and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L), hijacks the dynein-dynactin motor complex to travel from the neuromuscular junction toward the neuronal cell body [9, 27]. The P protein plays a pivotal role in this process by directly interacting with dynein light chain LC8 [27]. This interaction ensures that the viral RNP is transported efficiently along microtubules to the perikaryon, where replication and transcription can commence. The incubation period in reservoir hosts is highly variable, ranging from weeks to months, and is directly correlated with the distance the virus must travel along peripheral nerves to reach the CNS, the inoculum dose, and the host species-specific susceptibility factors [9, 28]. In wildlife reservoirs such as red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides), experimental challenge studies have demonstrated incubation periods as short as 12 days to several months, reflecting species-specific differences in axonal transport efficiency and the density of peripheral nerve innervation at the bite site [19, 20, 29].

Immune Evasion Strategies at the Molecular Level

One of the most remarkable aspects of RABV pathogenesis in reservoir hosts is its ability to evade the host immune response, particularly within the CNS, which is itself an immunologically privileged site. The virus employs a multi-pronged strategy to avoid clearance, allowing it to maintain transmission cycles within wildlife populations [9, 27, 28]. The P protein is a key mediator of immune evasion. It functions as a potent antagonist of the interferon (IFN) response by interfering with the activation of STAT1 and STAT2, thereby blocking the downstream signaling of both type I and type II interferons [9]. Specifically, the P protein binds to and sequesters STAT1 and STAT2 in the cytoplasm, preventing their translocation to the nucleus and subsequent activation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) [9, 27]. This inhibition is particularly effective in neurons, where the IFN response is already tightly regulated.

Furthermore, RABV limits the induction of apoptosis in infected neurons. While many viruses trigger programmed cell death as part of the host antiviral response, RABV has evolved mechanisms to maintain neuronal viability for extended periods. The viral matrix protein (M) has been implicated in modulating apoptosis, and the N protein may also contribute to the inhibition of caspase activation [27]. This preservation of neuronal function is paradoxically essential for the virus's transmission, as it ensures that the host remains ambulatory and capable of the behavioral changes (aggression, disorientation, increased salivation) that facilitate bite transmission [9, 27]. In bat reservoirs, which can harbor RABV without necessarily succumbing to rapid disease, additional molecular adaptations may exist that allow for persistent or latent infections. The observation of long-term seropositivity in vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) without clinical disease suggests that these reservoirs possess unique immunological or viral regulatory mechanisms that prevent lethal encephalitis while allowing for intermittent shedding [18, 27, 35].

Molecular Basis of Host-Specificity and Species Barriers

The molecular pathogenesis of RABV is profoundly influenced by host species-specific factors, which dictate whether a particular species serves as a maintenance reservoir, a spillover host, or a dead-end host. Phylogenetic analyses of RABV isolates from diverse reservoir hosts reveal distinct viral lineages that are often highly adapted to specific taxonomic groups [7, 18, 22, 24, 32]. For example, the raccoon RABV variant in eastern North America is maintained almost exclusively within raccoon (Procyon lotor) populations, whereas the south-central skunk variant circulates primarily in striped skunks [5, 10, 20, 37]. Molecular determinants of host specificity are encoded primarily in the glycoprotein (G) gene, particularly within the ectodomain responsible for receptor binding. Sequence variations in the G protein influence the efficiency of binding to host-specific isoforms of nAChR and NCAM, thereby affecting the ability to establish productive infection in a given species [22, 27].

Recent genomic and antigenic characterization of RABVs from white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica) in Mexico and ferret badgers (Melogale moschata) in Taiwan demonstrates that these species harbor unique viral clades that have undergone long-term adaptation [32, 34]. The ferret badger RABV in Taiwan, for instance, forms a distinct phylogenetic clade that has circulated independently from dog-maintained lineages for decades, with molecular clock analyses suggesting an introduction into the ferret badger population prior to the 1990s [32]. Similarly, the emergence of RABV in Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) in Inner Mongolia, China, with 99.4% nucleotide identity to bovine-associated cosmopolitan lineages, illustrates the dynamic nature of host shifting at the molecular level [2]. The relatively high genetic identity suggests a recent spillover event rather than long-term adaptation, but the capacity for onward transmission within badger populations raises concerns about the establishment of a new reservoir cycle [2].

The role of the phosphoprotein (P) and nucleoprotein (N) in host adaptation should not be underestimated. The N protein encapsidates the viral RNA and is a major target of the host T-cell response. Variations in N protein epitopes can influence recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, allowing for immune escape in novel host species [9, 27]. Furthermore, the P protein's interaction with host cellular factors, including dynein and STAT proteins, may be optimized for the specific intracellular environment of a given reservoir species [27]. This molecular co-adaptation helps explain why certain species, such as the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata) in Puerto Rico, can sustain RABV transmission cycles independently of domestic dogs, despite the virus originally being introduced through canine lineages [14, 25, 26].

Pathogenesis of Salivary Gland Infection and Shedding

The transmission of RABV from reservoir hosts to conspecifics, other wildlife, domestic animals, or humans depends on the efficient shedding of infectious virus in saliva. Molecular pathogenesis studies have elucidated the route by which the virus reaches the salivary glands. After extensive replication in the CNS, the virus travels anterogradely along autonomic nerves (primarily the parasympathetic and sympathetic fibers that innervate the salivary acinar cells) [5, 9]. The viral G protein mediates fusion at the nerve terminal, releasing viral RNP into the salivary gland parenchyma. Replication within the acinar epithelial cells leads to high titers of infectious virus being secreted into the saliva [5, 9].

Quantitative studies of viral isolation from salivary glands during skunk epizootics revealed that RABV was isolated from 84% of striped skunk salivary glands tested, with a similarly high rate (71%) observed in other wild and domestic carnivores [5]. This high percentage of salivary gland positivity across multiple reservoir and vector species indicates that the molecular machinery for efficient anterograde transport and glandular infection is conserved among diverse RABV variants. However, the intensity and duration of salivary shedding can vary. In some reservoir hosts, particularly bats, intermittent or chronic shedding may occur without overt clinical signs, a phenomenon that has been hypothesized to contribute to the maintenance of RABV in bat populations [18, 27]. The molecular mechanisms underlying this shedding pattern are not fully understood but may involve differential regulation of viral transcription or replication in salivary versus neuronal tissues, possibly mediated by host cellular microRNAs or tissue-specific transcription factors that affect the viral polymerase complex [27].

Molecular Determinants of Behavioral Modification and Transmission

The terminal phase of RABV pathogenesis in reservoir hosts is characterized by profound behavioral changes that enhance transmission. The virus induces a stereotypic syndrome of progressive encephalitis, with two major clinical forms: the furious form, marked by aggression, hyperexcitability, and disinhibition; and the paralytic form, characterized by ascending paralysis and stupor [9, 28]. The molecular basis for these divergent phenotypes is not completely elucidated, but it involves the selective targeting of specific neuronal populations. The serotonergic system appears to play a critical role. Immunohistochemical studies in bats (Myotis sp.) have demonstrated a wide distribution of serotonergic neurons in the hippocampus, including the dentate gyrus, CA1, CA2, and CA3 regions, and the subiculum [36]. Disruption of serotonergic signaling by RABV infection in these areas is hypothesized to contribute to the dysregulation of mood, aggression, and memory that characterize the furious form of the disease [9, 36].

Furthermore, the virus's predilection for the limbic system, including the amygdala and hippocampus, leads to the breakdown of normal fear responses and social inhibitions [9]. Infected reservoir hosts may approach humans or domestic animals with unusual boldness, or exhibit unprovoked aggression toward conspecifics, both of which increase the likelihood of bite transmission. The molecular pathways involved include the downregulation of neurotransmitter receptors and the induction of neuroinflammatory cytokines, which together create a state of neuronal dysfunction without immediate cell death [27]. This "stealth" infection of key brain regions ensures that the host remains capable of complex motor activities (locomotion, biting) while the virus spreads to the salivary glands.

In the context of vampire bat rabies, the behavioral pathogenesis may differ. Vampire bats are social animals that regurgitate blood to feed roost-mates and offspring, a behavior that provides an alternative transmission route beyond biting [18, 33, 35]. The molecular pathogenesis in bats may allow for viral shedding in saliva that contaminates regurgitated food, leading to oral exposure of conspecifics [33]. Experimental studies have documented litter-to-mother transmission in mice, suggesting that vertical or horizontal transmission via oral secretions could be a cryptic maintenance mechanism for RABV in wildlife [33]. The molecular adaptations that permit this alternative transmission route may involve differences in the stability of the virus in the oral environment or the ability to infect via mucosal surfaces, which is typically less efficient than intramuscular inoculation but could be sufficient in highly susceptible juvenile animals [9, 27].

Viral Evolution and Emergence of Novel Reservoir Cycles

The molecular pathogenesis of RABV is not static; the virus is constantly evolving under selective pressures imposed by host immune responses, ecological changes, and anthropogenic interventions such as culling and vaccination [27, 35]. Whole-genome sequencing and phylogeographic analyses have revealed that culling of vampire bats in Peru, while reducing population density, paradoxically accelerated viral spatial spread by inducing bat dispersal [35]. This finding underscores the intimate link between host behavior, population structure, and viral evolution at the molecular level. The viral quasispecies within an individual reservoir host can harbor variants with differing receptor-binding affinities or replication kinetics, providing the raw material for host shifting when a novel species is encountered [27].

The identification of novel RABV lineages in non-vampire bat species in Peru, which may represent new virus reservoirs, highlights the ongoing risk of viral emergence driven by molecular adaptation [18]. Gradient boosting machine learning models that incorporate host traits have identified 44 carnivore and 34 bat species with the trait profiles indicative of reservoir potential, many of which are located outside areas of current RABV circulation [4]. This suggests that the molecular pathogenesis of RABV is constrained by host physiological features such as litter size, age at sexual maturity, and phylogenetic relatedness to known reservoirs [4]. Understanding these molecular and ecological constraints is essential for predicting future spillover events and targeting surveillance efforts to high-risk host species.

Epidemiology of Rabies Virus in Wildlife Reservoirs: Global Patterns and Species Diversity

The epidemiology of rabies virus (RABV) in wildlife reservoirs represents a complex and dynamic tapestry of host-pathogen interactions that has undergone profound shifts over the past century. Historically, domestic dogs served as the primary global reservoir, responsible for the vast majority of human exposures and deaths. However, sustained vaccination campaigns and improved veterinary infrastructure in many regions have dramatically altered this landscape, revealing an increasingly prominent role for wildlife in maintaining and perpetuating RABV transmission cycles. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) have long recognized that understanding wildlife reservoir dynamics is essential for achieving global rabies elimination targets, as these sylvatic cycles pose persistent challenges to control efforts and represent an ongoing source of spillover into domestic animals and human populations [1, 9, 27].

The Shifting Paradigm: From Domestic to Sylvatic Cycles

In the United States, a remarkable epidemiological transition occurred during the latter half of the twentieth century. Prior to 1960, the majority of reported animal rabies cases involved domestic species; today, wildlife accounts for over 90% of all confirmed cases annually [13]. This transformation reflects the success of canine rabies control programs rather than an absolute increase in wildlife rabies incidence, though the latter has occurred in certain contexts. The principal wildlife reservoirs in North America now include raccoons (Procyon lotor), striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), red and Arctic foxes (Vulpes vulpes and Vulpes lagopus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and numerous bat species spanning multiple genera [4, 13, 20]. Each of these reservoirs maintains distinct viral variants that circulate independently within their respective host populations, with occasional cross-species transmission events that may or may not lead to sustained transmission in novel hosts [20, 27].

This pattern is not unique to North America. Across Europe, the red fox emerged as the primary wildlife reservoir following successful dog rabies elimination, necessitating the development of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) programs that have proven remarkably effective in reducing sylvatic rabies incidence [1, 19]. Estonia provides a compelling case study: following the implementation of biannual ORV campaigns targeting foxes and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides), rabies cases plummeted from 266 in 2005 to just three in 2008, with only sporadic cases near the Russian border thereafter [19]. Similarly, Poland has documented the circulation of both Central European and North-Eastern European RABV variants in its wildlife populations, with red foxes serving as the primary vector and reservoir [24]. The persistence of rabies in these systems underscores the critical importance of sustained vaccination efforts, as disruptions, such as those caused by military conflict, can rapidly reverse decades of progress [28, 38].

Taxonomic and Ecological Diversity of Wildlife Reservoirs

The canonical mammalian orders responsible for RABV maintenance are Carnivora and Chiroptera, yet the species composition within these orders varies dramatically across geographic regions and ecological contexts [4, 9]. A trait-based analytical approach employing gradient boosting machine learning models has identified key physiological and ecological features associated with reservoir status in both orders. Among carnivores, phylogenetic similarity to known RABV reservoirs, larger litter sizes, and earlier sexual maturity emerged as significant predictors. For bats, geographic location in the Americas, extensive geographic range, and large litter size were most strongly associated with reservoir competence [4]. These predictive models identified 44 carnivore and 34 bat species not currently recognized as RABV reservoirs but possessing trait profiles suggestive of reservoir potential, highlighting the dynamic and evolving nature of RABV host ranges [4].

Carnivore Reservoirs: A Global Mosaic

The diversity of carnivore species serving as RABV reservoirs reflects the virus's remarkable adaptability and the ecological heterogeneity of its hosts. In sub-Saharan Africa, domestic dogs remain the predominant reservoir, but wildlife species, particularly black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) and various mongoose species, contribute significantly to transmission cycles in certain regions [3, 23]. In Tanzania's Lindi and Mtwara regions, jackals represent an unusually high proportion of animal rabies cases, suggesting the potential for independent wildlife transmission cycles that could complicate dog-centered control strategies [3]. South Africa's North West province provides further evidence of complex multi-host dynamics: phylogenetic analysis of cattle rabies viruses revealed four distinct clades, three belonging to the canid biotype and one to the mongoose biotype, with evidence of cross-species transmission between dogs, jackals, mongooses, and cattle [23].

In Asia, the reservoir landscape is equally diverse and regionally specific. China has documented RABV in multiple wildlife species, including bats, Chinese ferret badgers (Melogale moschata), raccoon dogs, foxes, and wolves [22]. Notably, phylogenetic analyses indicate that wildlife-originating RABVs in China are distinct from local dog-originating strains and are associated with older clades II through V, suggesting the existence of long-established wildlife reservoirs [22]. The discovery of a rabies virus strain in a Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in Inner Mongolia, China, with 99.4% nucleotide identity to dominant bovine-associated cosmopolitan lineages, provides robust evidence of interspecies transmission from wildlife to livestock, potentially involving a "fox-badger-livestock" transmission chain [2]. Taiwan's experience with rabies in ferret badgers further illustrates the capacity for wildlife to sustain long-term viral circulation: phylogenetic analysis revealed three major genotypes distributed across distinct geographic regions separated by river and mountain barriers, indicating that the biological profile of ferret badgers varies across different ecological contexts [32].

Iran presents yet another dimension of carnivore reservoir diversity, with wolves (Canis lupus pallipes) serving as important vectors in western and northwestern regions [16]. Analysis of a 10-year dataset revealed that 55% of animal bites occurred in rural areas, with wolves from Fars province representing a significant proportion of rabid wildlife cases [16]. The gray wolf's role as a reservoir is particularly concerning given its wide-ranging behavior and potential for long-distance viral dissemination.

Chiropteran Reservoirs: The Americas as a Unique Arena

The Americas stand alone as the only region where bat rabies occurs, and bats have emerged as increasingly significant reservoirs of RABV infection for humans and domestic animals [7, 18]. While carnivore rabies is being progressively managed across the region, bat-borne RABV presents unique challenges due to the diversity of species involved, the complexity of transmission dynamics, and the difficulty of implementing control measures in volant, often reclusive populations [7, 35].

A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bat-borne RABV diversity in Argentina and the broader Americas revealed that host genus and geography both shape the global phylogenetic structure [7]. Consistent with determinants of cross-species transmission (CST), most bat genera formed monophyletic or paraphyletic clusters in the RABV phylogeny, with stronger CST evidence between host genera of the same family. Notably, the genus Myotis was identified as a potential ancestral spreader of much of the RABV diversity observed in American bats [7]. This finding aligns with research on Myotis sp. in Indonesia, where serotonergic neuron distribution in the hippocampus was characterized, supporting the species' potential as a rabies reservoir [36].

The common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) deserves particular attention due to its direct public health and economic impacts. In Peru, phylogenetic analysis of 157 RABV isolates collected from humans, domestic animals, and wildlife revealed distinct geographic structuring, indicating that RABVs spread gradually through different vampire bat subpopulations with different transmission cycles [18]. Three putative new RABV lineages were identified in non-vampire bat species, suggesting the existence of previously unrecognized reservoirs [18]. The public health significance of vampire bat rabies is underscored by increasing human infection rates in remote Amazonian regions where these bats commonly feed on humans [18].

Transmission Dynamics and Maintenance Mechanisms

Understanding how RABV is maintained within wildlife populations requires examination of transmission routes, host behavior, and population structure. In wildlife, intra- and interspecies fights, community grooming, sharing food by regurgitation, and aerosol secretion all contribute to viral dissemination [33]. A particularly intriguing phenomenon is litter-to-mother vertical transmission, which has been proposed as a mechanism that could preserve the virus in wildlife reservoirs. During mouse inoculation tests, extended maternal observation revealed that infected pups could transmit the virus to their mothers, potentially creating a transmission loop that maintains viral circulation even when horizontal transmission opportunities are limited [33].

The role of salivary gland infection in transmission risk has been quantified in several reservoir species. During a skunk rabies epizootic in northern Colorado, RABV was isolated from 84.0% of striped skunk salivary glands and 71% of other carnivore salivary glands, indicating that infected reservoir and vector species were equally likely to shed the virus and pose secondary transmission risks [5]. This high rate of salivary gland infection underscores the efficiency of bite transmission in maintaining sylvatic cycles.

Culling as a control strategy has been critically evaluated, particularly in vampire bat populations. A 2-year, spatially extensive bat cull in Peru failed to reduce spillover to livestock despite reducing bat population density [35]. Bayesian state-space models and viral whole-genome sequencing revealed that culling before virus arrival slowed viral spatial spread, but reactive culling paradoxically accelerated spread, likely due to culling-induced changes in bat dispersal patterns that promoted viral invasions [35]. These findings challenge core assumptions of density-dependent transmission and localized viral maintenance that underlie culling strategies, providing an epidemiological and evolutionary framework for understanding intervention outcomes in complex wildlife disease systems.

Geographic Patterns and Emerging Frontiers

The global distribution of wildlife rabies is not uniform, and several regions warrant particular attention due to their unique epidemiological characteristics or emerging threats. The Arctic rabies strain, maintained primarily in Arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus), circulates across northern Canada and Alaska, yet surveillance in the Yukon has detected no cases since the 1970s despite testing 763 samples from 13 mammal species [41]. This apparent absence may reflect low prevalence or inadequate surveillance of reservoir species, particularly at jurisdictional borders where shifts in species distributions or migratory movements could rapidly alter transmission dynamics [41].

In Latin America, the challenge of wildlife rabies is compounded by the presence of multiple reservoir taxa and limited surveillance infrastructure. Brazil's semiarid Caatinga region, despite reports of RABV circulation in both domestic and wild animal populations, yielded no positive cases among 18 road-killed mammals tested, suggesting either healthy populations or prevalence below detection thresholds [42]. However, the detection of novel coronaviruses in neotropical bats from the same region underscores the vast, unexplored viral diversity in these ecosystems and the need for systematic surveillance [40].

The Caribbean presents a unique epidemiological scenario, with the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata) serving as the primary terrestrial wildlife rabies reservoir in Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Grenada [14, 25, 26]. Mongooses account for over 70% of reported animal rabies cases in Puerto Rico annually [14, 25]. Serosurveys across multiple habitats revealed that 17.0% of sampled mongooses were positive for rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies, with seroprevalence varying by habitat and sex [25]. The ecological interactions between mongooses and free-roaming domestic dogs (FRDD) are critical for understanding cross-species transmission risk. GPS tracking and proximity data revealed that close interspecific contacts occurred among only 4% of collared mongoose-dog dyads and were infrequent and spatially restricted to road and forest edges [26]. Intraspecific contacts among mongooses were more common and occurred within wildlands, while dog-dog contacts were most frequent near human residential development. Feral FRDD may represent a vector between mongooses and dogs living close to humans, with transitional areas between wildlands and human development serving as hotspots for infectious disease transmission [26].

The Impact of Anthropogenic and Environmental Disruption

The epidemiology of wildlife rabies is increasingly influenced by human activities that alter habitat use, animal movement patterns, and host population dynamics. The ongoing war in Ukraine provides a stark illustration of how conflict can disrupt rabies control. Before 2022, coordinated ORV programs and systematic immunization of domestic animals had contributed to a gradual decline in disease incidence. However, the full-scale Russian invasion caused a collapse of veterinary infrastructure, disrupted vaccination logistics, and led to the displacement of millions of people and animals [38]. Between 2022 and 2024, Ukraine reported a more than twofold increase in rabies cases among animals. The Ivano-Frankivsk region, despite its distance from combat zones, demonstrated a doubling of rabies cases by 2024 compared to 2020-2021, with cases reaching pre-war levels by mid-2025 [38]. Similarly, the Lviv region experienced a fivefold increase in rabies cases between 2021 and 2024 [28]. These data highlight the fragility of rabies control achievements and the rapidity with which wildlife reservoirs can re-establish transmission when interventions are interrupted.

In pastoral regions of Ethiopia's Somali Region, drought conditions compel pastoralists to migrate to remote habitats in search of grazing lands, resulting in heightened interaction between livestock and wildlife [6]. The major causes of rabies outbreaks in this region include increased wildlife-livestock contact, lack of mass vaccination for at-risk dogs, low dog ownership rates, poor animal health infrastructure, limited diagnostic capacity, and weak surveillance systems [6]. These factors create conditions conducive to sustained viral circulation in wildlife and frequent spillover events.

Implications for Surveillance and Control

The epidemiological complexity of wildlife rabies necessitates sophisticated surveillance approaches that account for the diversity of reservoir species and the dynamic nature of transmission cycles. The US National Rabies Surveillance System (NRSS) has developed criteria for classifying counties as free from terrestrial rabies based on testing history and geographic context, achieving a 99.2% negative predictive value for identifying truly rabies-free areas [10]. However, even counties with a high probability of rabies freedom must maintain testing capacity, as translocations of infected animals can cause major changes in epidemiology [10].

The development of oral rabies vaccination has revolutionized wildlife rabies control, but species-specific differences in vaccine uptake efficiency pose challenges. Clear differences have been observed in vaccine titers needed to induce protective immune responses across reservoir species [30]. The palatine tonsils play a critical role in vaccine virus uptake, and species such as the striped skunk show less efficient tonsillar infection compared to red foxes, leading to reduced responses to oral vaccination [30]. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing novel strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy in problematic species.

Trap-vaccinate-release (TVR) protocols offer an alternative for species or habitats less amenable to oral vaccination. In Flagstaff, Arizona, TVR has been used safely and effectively for over two decades to prevent and control rabies during cross-species transmission events from bats to mesocarnivores such as skunks [8]. Similarly, research into oral rabies vaccines for small Indian mongooses in Puerto Rico has explored the use of iophenoxic acid analogues as biomarkers to estimate bait uptake, with ethyl- and methyl-iophenoxic acid showing adequate marking ability for at least eight and four weeks, respectively [14].

The concept of transmissible vaccines, exploiting benign viruses as self-spreading vectors, represents a frontier in wildlife rabies control. A betaherpesvirus found in vampire bats has been identified as a potential candidate vector for a transmissible vaccine targeting vampire bat rabies [39]. Epidemiological models and field-derived viral genomic data suggest that such a vaccine could achieve high coverage and long-term prevention of rabies outbreaks in bat populations [39]. This approach could overcome the fundamental challenge of delivering vaccines to remote and reclusive wildlife populations, offering a paradigm shift in our ability to manage sylvatic rabies cycles.

The epidemiology of rabies virus in wildlife reservoirs is characterized by remarkable diversity in host species, transmission dynamics, and geographic patterns. From the Arctic fox maintaining the northernmost RABV lineage to the vampire bat perpetuating cycles in Amazonian ecosystems, from the mongoose-dominated systems of the Caribbean to the multi-host complexes of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, the virus demonstrates a capacity for persistence that challenges

Diagnostics and Surveillance of Rabies Virus in Wildlife Populations

The effective management of rabies virus (RABV) in wildlife reservoirs is predicated upon a robust, multi-layered framework of diagnostics and surveillance. Unlike domestic animal populations, where vaccination status and movement can be tracked, wildlife reservoirs present unique challenges: cryptic infection dynamics, vast home ranges, and the inherent difficulty of sampling free-ranging animals. Consequently, the architecture of surveillance must be both opportunistic and targeted, employing a suite of diagnostic tools that extend from traditional virological methods to cutting-edge molecular epidemiology and serological monitoring. This section critically examines the methodologies and strategies underpinning our understanding of RABV circulation in wildlife, drawing on global case studies to illustrate the principles of effective detection and monitoring.

Core Diagnostic Methodologies: From Gold Standards to Molecular Advances

The diagnostic confirmation of rabies in wildlife hinges on the detection of the viral antigen, nucleic acid, or the isolation of infectious virus. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) recommend the direct fluorescent antibody test (dFAT) as the gold standard for post-mortem diagnosis in fresh brain tissue [9]. This test, which utilizes fluorescein-conjugated antibodies targeting the viral nucleoprotein, offers a sensitivity and specificity approaching 100% when applied to fresh specimens. However, its reliability diminishes significantly in decomposed or autolyzed tissues, a common issue when sampling wildlife carcasses found in the field. In such cases, the mouse inoculation test (MIT), historically a cornerstone of rabies diagnostics, remains a valuable tool for amplifying and isolating virus from degraded samples, although international organizations have advocated for its gradual replacement due to animal welfare concerns [33]. Interestingly, the prolonged observation of inoculated litters in MIT protocols has revealed the phenomenon of litter-to-mother vertical transmission in laboratory settings, a mechanism that could have implications for viral persistence in natural wildlife reservoirs [33].

For cases where dFAT yields equivocal results or where sample integrity is compromised, molecular diagnostics, particularly reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), have become indispensable. RT-PCR offers superior sensitivity, can detect viral RNA in decomposed tissues, and provides the raw material for subsequent genetic characterization [9, 28]. The true power of molecular diagnostics, however, lies in its ability to generate sequence data. Phylogenetic analysis of nucleoprotein (N) and glycoprotein (G) gene sequences allows for the unequivocal identification of RABV variants and the inference of cross-species transmission events. For instance, studies in South Africa have used genetic typing to demonstrate that cattle rabies in the North West Province results from spillover from both domestic dogs (canid biotype) and wildlife species like the yellow mongoose (mongoose biotype), highlighting the complex interplay between reservoir and spillover hosts [23]. Similarly, the first isolation of RABV from a Eurasian badger in Inner Mongolia, China, revealed a 99.4% nucleotide identity with bovine-associated cosmopolitan lineages, providing robust evidence of a transmission chain linking wildlife to livestock [2].

Despite the power of PCR, serological surveillance remains a critical component, particularly for assessing the herd immunity of vaccinated populations and for detecting prior exposure in apparently healthy animals. The gold standard serological tests, the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization (FAVN) test, measure virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNAs) and are recommended by both WHO and WOAH for quantifying post-vaccination responses [11]. However, these tests require live virus, specialized facilities, and are difficult to standardize across laboratories. This has driven the development of alternative assays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) targeting glycoprotein-specific antibodies. In the context of wildlife oral rabies vaccination (ORV) monitoring, some studies suggest that a blocking ELISA result at Day 28 post-vaccination may be a better predictor of survival than serum neutralization test results, offering a standardized and practical tool for field-based surveillance [43]. The detection of RABV-specific T cell activity, as demonstrated using an NDV-vectored rabies vaccine in foxes and goats, represents an emerging frontier in assessing cell-mediated immunity after oral vaccination [31].

Surveillance Strategies: Passive, Active, and Integrated Approaches

Wildlife surveillance operates along a spectrum from passive to active, each with distinct strengths and biases. Passive surveillance, the reporting and testing of animals found sick, dead, or involved in human-wildlife conflict, is the most common and cost-effective method [41]. It relies on the public, wildlife rehabilitators, and road-kill collection programs. In the Yukon, Canada, for example, a surveillance program initiated in 2009 tested 763 opportunistically collected samples from 13 species, including the primary reservoir, the Arctic fox, and found all to be negative for RABV antigen, suggesting a potential absence of the virus despite its circulation in adjacent jurisdictions [41]. However, passive surveillance is inherently biased toward reporting highly pathogenic strains that cause obvious neurological signs and is less effective at detecting low-prevalence infections or those in cryptic species like bats.

Active surveillance, by contrast, involves the deliberate capture, sampling, and release or euthanasia of target species. This can take the form of trap-vaccinate-release (TVR) programs, which serve a dual purpose of vaccination and monitoring [8]. TVR is particularly effective for species like skunks, which may be less amenable to ORV bait uptake, and allows for the collection of blood samples for serology and the deployment of biomarkers to assess vaccine bait consumption [8, 14]. For example, the use of iophenoxic acid analogues as biomarkers in small Indian mongooses in Puerto Rico has enabled researchers to estimate bait uptake rates in the field, a critical parameter for evaluating ORV campaign success [14]. Active surveillance is resource-intensive but provides unbiased prevalence estimates and is essential for detecting enzootic circulation in reservoir populations.

A powerful synthesis of these approaches is the use of spatial epidemiological models to define rabies-free zones. The US National Rabies Surveillance System (NRSS) historically classified a county as free from terrestrial rabies if, over five years, no cases were reported in the county or adjacent counties and a threshold number of reservoir or domestic animals had been tested [10]. A zero-inflated negative binomial model analyzing 14,642 raccoon and 30,120 skunk county-years confirmed that counties meeting these criteria had a 99.2% negative predictive value for detecting a case in the following year [10]. Such models provide a probabilistic framework for public health decision-making, allowing for the allocation of resources for post-exposure prophylaxis and the prioritization of surveillance in high-risk areas.

Molecular Epidemiology and Phylogeography: Tracing Viral Movements

Contemporary surveillance has been revolutionized by the integration of phylogenetics and phylogeography. By analyzing the genetic relatedness of viral isolates, researchers can reconstruct transmission networks and identify the source of outbreaks. In Peru, for example, phylogenetic analysis of RABV isolates from vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) revealed distinct geographic structuring, indicating that the virus spreads gradually through different bat subpopulations [18]. Critically, this work also identified three putative new RABV lineages in non-vampire bat species, suggesting the existence of previously unrecognized reservoir hosts [18]. Similarly, the identification of a raccoon rabies case in western Virginia, a region considered free of the raccoon variant, was traced to a specific geographic origin using a high-throughput microhaplotype genotyping panel for raccoons, demonstrating the utility of host genetics in forensics [37].

Phylogeographic analysis has also been instrumental in understanding the impact of interventions. A study assessing the effect of culling vampire bats in Peru used viral whole-genome sequencing and Bayesian state-space models to show that prophylactic culling before virus arrival slowed its spatial spread, whereas reactive culling after virus arrival paradoxically accelerated spread, likely due to culling-induced changes in bat dispersal [35]. These findings, which challenge the density-dependent transmission assumptions underlying culling as a control strategy, are a powerful testament to the need for genomic surveillance to evaluate intervention outcomes. In Taiwan, phylogeographic analysis of ferret badger rabies viruses revealed that three major genotypes are confined to distinct geographic regions by natural river and mountain barriers, providing a spatial framework for targeted surveillance and emergency response [32].

The Role of Serosurveys and Multi-Host Dynamics

Serosurveys are essential for characterizing the risk of spillover and for understanding the maintenance of RABV in multi-host communities. In Puerto Rico, a serosurvey of small Indian mongooses across six habitat types revealed that 17% of 464 individuals had detectable rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies, with seroprevalence varying significantly by habitat [25]. This suggests that transmission intensity is spatially heterogeneous, potentially driven by local density or contact rates with free-roaming domestic dogs (FRDD) [26]. Intriguingly, a study using GPS tracking and camera traps found that while mongooses and FRDD exhibited temporal overlap in activity, interspecific contact was rare (only 4% of dyads) and confined to road and forest edges [26]. This fine-scale behavioral data, combined with serological and genetic surveillance, provides a nuanced picture of the spillover interface.

Trait-based modeling approaches further enhance our ability to predict which species may serve as reservoirs. A gradient boosting machine learning model identified that carnivore reservoirs are associated with larger litters, earlier sexual maturity, and phylogenetic similarity to known reservoirs, while bat reservoirs are predicted by geographic range and location in the Americas [4]. The model flagged 44 carnivore and 34 bat species with trait profiles suggesting they could be or become reservoirs, offering a proactive framework for surveillance [4]. Such predictive analytics are invaluable for allocating limited surveillance resources in biodiverse regions where many species remain poorly studied.

Diagnostic Challenges in Emerging and Conflict-Affected Regions

The effectiveness of any surveillance system is contingent on the integrity of the diagnostic infrastructure. In conflict-affected regions, such as Ukraine during the ongoing war, the breakdown of veterinary services, disrupted vaccination logistics, and the displacement of human and animal populations have led to a resurgence of rabies [28, 38]. The Lviv region saw a fivefold increase in rabies cases from 2021 to 2024, underscoring how quickly gaps in surveillance can reverse years of progress [28]. In such settings, the restoration of laboratory capacity and cross-border cooperation are urgent priorities. Similarly, in pastoral areas of the Somali Region of Ethiopia, limited diagnostic capacity, weak surveillance systems, and poor animal health infrastructure are major causes of persistent rabies outbreaks, highlighting the need for a One Health approach that integrates communication, co-ordination, and capacity building across the human-animal-environment interface [6].

A persistent challenge is the detection of RABV in species that do not display classic furious rabies. The white-nosed coati in Mexico, for instance, has been implicated in outbreaks, yet historical surveillance has been insufficient to classify it as a major reservoir [34]. Only through systematic analysis of 13 samples collected over 30 years (1993–2022) could researchers confirm the presence of RABV variants in this species, leading to calls for enhanced surveillance [34]. The detection of atypical lyssaviruses, such as the Irkut virus isolated from a bat in China, further complicates diagnostics, as these agents may not be detected by standard RABV-specific reagents [22]. These examples emphasize the need for pan-lyssavirus diagnostics and a flexible surveillance architecture that can adapt to emerging threats.

Transmission Dynamics and Maintenance Mechanisms in Wildlife Reservoirs

The perpetuation of rabies virus (RABV) within wildlife reservoirs is a function of intricate biological, ecological, and behavioral processes that distinguish enzootic maintenance from sporadic spillover events. Unlike the acute, self-limiting infections seen in many dead-end hosts, RABV has evolved sophisticated mechanisms to ensure its persistence within specific mammalian populations, primarily within the orders Carnivora and Chiroptera [4, 27]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) recognize that understanding these maintenance mechanisms is paramount for designing effective control strategies, as the disruption of transmission within the reservoir is the only sustainable path to preventing spillover to humans and domestic animals [1, 15].

The Bite-Centric Paradigm and the Role of Salivary Shedding

The foundational mechanism of RABV transmission is the introduction of virus-laden saliva into a bite wound. The neurotropic path of the virus culminates in massive replication within the salivary glands, a prerequisite for onward transmission [9]. The efficiency of this process is staggering. In a study of the south-central skunk (SCSK) variant epizootic in Colorado, virus isolation was successful from 84% of salivary glands from rabid striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) and 71% from other spillover carnivores, confirming that infected reservoir species are highly effective at shedding infectious virus [5]. This high rate of salivary gland infection is a critical adaptation, ensuring that a rabid animal is a potent transmission vehicle. The classic behavioral manifestation of furious rabies, aggression and disinhibition, further amplifies this by maximizing the probability of bite contacts with conspecifics and heterospecifics [9]. This creates a vicious cycle: the virus induces the behavior most likely to facilitate its own dissemination, a hallmark of an exquisitely co-evolved pathogen.

Reservoirs, Spillover Hosts, and the Maintenance Community Concept

A defining feature of rabies epizootiology is the distinction between reservoir hosts, which can sustain the virus indefinitely, and spillover or dead-end hosts, which cannot. A trait-based analysis using machine learning models identified that for carnivores, phylogenetic relatedness to known reservoirs, coupled with life-history traits such as larger litter sizes and earlier sexual maturity, significantly predicted reservoir status [4]. This suggests that RABV maintenance is not random; it is structured by the evolutionary and ecological profiles of the host. For example, while many carnivore species can become infected with the SCSK variant during an epizootic in Colorado, only the striped skunk appears capable of sustaining independent circulation, with other species like raccoons and foxes acting as transient spillover hosts that do not propagate the variant further [20]. Similarly, in southern Tanzania, jackals represent an unusually high proportion of cases, suggesting a role in maintenance that complicates control strategies predicated solely on domestic dog vaccination [3]. This maintenance community can be dynamic; in South Africa's North West province, phylogenetic analysis of cattle rabies revealed that spillover originated from both domestic dogs and wildlife (black-backed jackals and yellow mongooses), with distinct canid and mongoose biotypes circulating concurrently [23]. Such findings underscore that rabies is a multi-host pathogen where the lines between reservoir and spillover are fluid and geographically specific.

Mechanisms of Viral Persistence: Carrier States and Vertical Transmission

For decades, the canonical view held that rabies was invariably fatal, leaving no room for a carrier state. However, evidence is accumulating for alternative maintenance mechanisms. The most provocative is the documentation of litter-to-mother vertical transmission in a murine model, where suckling pups infected during the mouse inoculation test transmitted the virus to their mother via mammary tissue or close contact [33]. This phenomenon, if it occurs in wild reservoirs, could offer a mechanism for the virus to persist within a social group even without the extreme aggression of a fully rabid adult. It suggests a low-pathogenicity transmission route that could maintain the virus across generations, particularly in species with high fecundity and prolonged maternal care. Furthermore, serosurveys frequently reveal a proportion of antibody-positive animals that are not currently viremic or rabid, indicating past exposure and survival. In the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata) of Puerto Rico, 17% of sampled individuals across multiple habitats had rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies (RVNA), suggesting non-lethal infections or recovery from sub-lethal exposures [25]. While the existence of a true latent carrier state in wildlife remains controversial and requires further molecular confirmation, these data point to a range of infection outcomes that may allow the virus to smolder within a population at low prevalence.

Culling-Induced Perturbation and Altered Dispersal Dynamics

Interventions designed to reduce reservoir density can paradoxically alter transmission dynamics in counterintuitive ways. A landmark study on vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) culling in Peru, using Bayesian state-space models and viral whole-genome sequencing, demonstrated that large-scale, reactive culling failed to reduce rabies spillover into livestock, despite successfully reducing bat population density [35]. The critical finding was that culling accelerated the spatial spread of the virus. The mechanism driving this acceleration is hypothesized to be culling-induced perturbation of bat social structure, increasing dispersal rates as surviving bats seek new roosts or territories. This heightened movement promoted viral invasions into new areas, effectively undoing any benefit of reduced density. This challenges the core assumption of density-dependent transmission that underlies many culling-based control strategies. The authors concluded that for a long-lived, socially complex reservoir like the vampire bat, culling can be counterproductive, potentially turning a contained enzootic cycle into an expanding epizootic [35]. This finding has profound implications for wildlife management and aligns with the WHO's and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) cautious stance on non-targeted culling.

The Role of Social Structure and Contact Networks

Maintenance of rabies within a population is inextricably linked to the frequency and nature of contacts between individuals. In Puerto Rico, GPS and proximity tracking of mongooses and free-roaming domestic dogs revealed that interspecific contacts were rare (4% of dyads) and spatially restricted to road and forest edges, while intraspecific contacts among mongooses were more frequent and occurred within wildlands [26]. This spatial partitioning suggests that RABV transmission among mongooses is primarily driven by their own intraspecific interactions, likely linked to territorial defense, mating, or communal denning. The study further identified home-range overlap as a significant predictor of contact rates, which can serve as a useful proxy for transmission risk [26]. In contrast, the raccoon rabies variant in the eastern United States is maintained within a highly connected metapopulation, where hierarchical genetic structure of host populations is linked through isolation-by-distance, facilitating the gradual spread of the virus across the landscape [37]. The introduction of a rabid raccoon into a previously rabies-free county, as occurred in Wise County, Virginia, demonstrates how long-distance translocation events, often anthropogenic, can bridge spatial gaps and ignite new epizootics [21]. Thus, the maintenance of rabies is not solely a function of viral biology but is fundamentally governed by the socio-spatial fabric of the reservoir host.

Immunological and Host Factors in Viral Maintenance

The ability of a species to act as a resilient reservoir is also influenced by its immunological response to infection. While acute infection is typically lethal, the oral vaccination of wildlife has illuminated critical differences in species susceptibility. For instance, striped skunks are notoriously refractory to oral rabies vaccination (ORV) compared to red foxes. Research has shown that the palatine tonsils are the critical sites of vaccine virus uptake, and infection of these tonsils is absent in skunks, leading to a much less efficient induction of a protective immune response [30]. This inherent resistance to mucosal infection likely translates to a higher tolerance for low-level viral replication in the wild, potentially allowing skunks to support sustained transmission chains that are less susceptible to population-level immunity achieved through ORV. Conversely, in species like the gray wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in Iran, a single oral dose of the V-RG® vaccine proved immunogenic, producing neutralizing antibody titers ≥0.5 IU/mL that were maintained for up to 78 weeks [16]. This suggests that the immunological "gatekeeper" functions differently across species, dictating their capacity to both respond to vaccine campaigns and, by extension, to maintain natural viral circulation. The presence of pre-existing antibodies in a population, as seen in mongooses [25], may also modulate transmission by reducing the number of fully susceptible individuals, thereby slowing the rate of epizootic spread, yet failing to eliminate the pathogen due to the constant influx of new, naive juveniles.

Oral Vaccination Strategies and Control of Rabies in Wildlife

The control of rabies in wildlife reservoirs represents one of the most formidable challenges in contemporary zoonotic disease management. Unlike domestic animal vaccination, which can be achieved through parenteral administration under relatively controlled conditions, wildlife immunization necessitates innovative strategies that overcome the fundamental constraints of free-ranging, often reclusive, target populations. Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) has emerged as the preeminent tool for addressing this challenge, fundamentally altering the landscape of rabies control across Europe and North America [1, 9, 34]. This approach leverages the natural foraging behaviors of target species to deliver immunogenic agents, effectively creating a herd immunity barrier that interrupts viral transmission within reservoir populations.

The Conceptual and Historical Foundations of Oral Vaccination

The rationale for ORV is grounded in the ecological reality that rabies virus persists within multi-host systems where traditional control methods, such as culling or parenteral vaccination of captured animals, are logistically prohibitive and often ineffective at scale [9, 35]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) have long recognized that long-term rabies elimination in enzootic regions depends critically on the management of sylvatic cycles [9, 11]. The seminal successes of ORV programs in Europe against red fox (Vulpes vulpes) rabies, and in North America against coyote (Canis latrans) and raccoon (Procyon lotor) rabies, have provided a robust proof-of-concept that has guided global implementation [1, 15]. These programs demonstrated that distributing vaccine-laden baits across landscapes can achieve population-level seroconversion rates sufficient to drive local virus extinction, a feat that culling alone has repeatedly failed to accomplish, and in some cases, has paradoxically exacerbated viral spread [20, 35].

The biological principle underpinning ORV is that the vaccine virus must efficiently infect the oropharyngeal mucosa of the target animal, replicating locally in the palatine tonsils and regional lymph nodes to induce a robust, protective immune response prior to any potential natural exposure [30]. This requirement introduces a critical species-specific hurdle: not all reservoir hosts are equally susceptible to oral immunization [30]. The differential efficiency of vaccine uptake and replication in the oral cavity dictates the efficacy of ORV across different taxa, a factor that has profound implications for program design.

Vaccine Platforms: Attenuated, Recombinant, and Viral-Vectored Systems

The evolution of ORV has been marked by a progression from live-attenuated vaccines to safer, genetically engineered recombinant vectors. Early oral vaccines, such as the Street Alabama Dufferin (SAD) strain and its derivatives (e.g., SAD B19, SAG2), are live-attenuated rabies viruses that have demonstrated high efficacy in foxes and raccoon dogs [15, 19]. The SAG2 vaccine, for instance, was instrumental in eliminating rabies from Estonia following biannual aerial baiting campaigns that achieved tetracycline biomarker positivity rates of 85–93% in foxes and 82–88% in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) [19]. However, concerns regarding residual pathogenicity for non-target species, including rodents and other small mammals, prompted the development of safer alternatives [15].

The next generation of ORV agents comprises recombinant vaccines that express the rabies virus glycoprotein (G) within the genome of a replication-competent viral vector. The most widely deployed of these is the vaccinia-rabies glycoprotein recombinant virus (V-RG), marketed as Raboral V-RG®, which has been used extensively in Europe and North America for the immunization of raccoons, coyotes, and foxes [15, 16]. The V-RG vaccine has also demonstrated cross-species utility; a study in captive gray wolves (Canis lupus pallipes) in Iran showed that a single oral dose induced seroconversion (titers ≥0.5 IU/mL) by 12 weeks, with protective immunity persisting for 78 weeks, suggesting that vaccines designed for smaller mesocarnivores can be effective in larger canids with appropriate dosing [16]. More recently, a recombinant raccoon poxvirus (RCN)-vectored vaccine expressing a mosaic glycoprotein (MoG) has shown promise for bat immunization, a significant frontier given that bats are primary reservoirs in the Americas and no licensed oral vaccine currently exists for chiropteran species [12]. This vaccine induced significant humoral responses and conferred protection against intracerebral challenge in mice, highlighting the potential for expanding ORV to new taxonomic orders [12].

Newcastle disease virus (NDV)-vectored vaccines represent another innovative platform. A lentogenic NDV strain expressing the rabies G protein (rNDV_GRABV) was shown to be safe and immunogenic after a single oral dose in both goats (a representative spillover species) and foxes. Five of six vaccinated goats developed RABV-specific antibodies, while three of six foxes seroconverted, and antigen-specific T cell activity was detected in pharyngeal lymph nodes [31]. This platform offers the advantage of using a vector with a proven safety record in avian species and no known pathogenicity for mammals, potentially addressing safety concerns associated with poxvirus vectors in immunocompromised individuals [31].

Species-Specific Barriers and Mechanisms of Oral Vaccine Resistance

A critical limitation in ORV efficacy is the marked variation in species susceptibility to oral immunization. The striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis) is notoriously refractory to oral rabies vaccination compared to red foxes, which are highly susceptible [30]. Comparative studies have revealed that this resistance is mechanistically linked to vaccine virus infection of the palatine tonsils. In foxes, the SPBN GASGAS vaccine virus readily infects tonsillar epithelial cells, leading to localized viral replication and dissemination. In skunks, however, virus-infected cells are conspicuously absent in the palatine tonsils, suggesting either a failure of the virus to adhere to or penetrate the mucosal epithelium, or an enhanced local innate immune response that rapidly clears the inoculum [30]. This differential susceptibility necessitates higher vaccine titers or alternative bait delivery systems for skunks, and explains why ORV has been less successful in controlling skunk rabies epizootics, such as the south-central skunk variant outbreak that expanded from Colorado into previously rabies-free areas [5, 20].

This challenge underscores a fundamental principle in wildlife vaccination: a "one-size-fits-all" approach is inadequate. The target species must be the primary consideration in vaccine selection, bait design (including attractants and matrix), and program monitoring [30].

Operational Implementation: Baiting, Biomarkers, and Landscape-Level Deployment

The operational success of ORV hinges on precise spatial and temporal bait distribution, coupled with robust monitoring of bait uptake and immune response. Aerial baiting is the most cost-effective method for large, remote, or inaccessible areas, while ground-based distribution (including hand-baiting) is used in urban or fragmented landscapes [19, 44]. The density of baits per square kilometer is a critical variable; European programs typically distribute 20–30 baits/km², with higher densities in outbreak zones [19, 45]. Bait composition must balance palatability, stability in the environment, and safety for non-target species. Baits typically contain a fishmeal or meat-based attractant, a vaccine sachet, and a biomarker such as tetracycline, which chelates to bone and teeth, providing a lasting record of bait consumption in sampled animals [19].

Monitoring the immunological impact of ORV requires sophisticated serological surveillance. The gold standard assays for detecting rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNAs) are the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization (FAVN) test, both recommended by the WHO and WOAH [11, 43]. However, these tests require live virus and containment facilities. More recent developments in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) offer advantages in standardization and throughput. Importantly, a comparative analysis of serological correlates of protection found that a blocking ELISA result at day 28 post-vaccination was a better predictor of survival in captive challenge studies than serum neutralization test results, suggesting that certain binding antibody assays may more accurately reflect protective immunity [43].

Biomarkers such as iophenoxic acid (IPA) derivatives provide an additional layer of monitoring, particularly in species where background seroprevalence due to natural exposure complicates interpretation of vaccination-induced antibody responses. In the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata), a primary rabies reservoir in Puerto Rico, ethyl-IPA and methyl-IPA incorporated into baits provided reliable serological marking for 8 and 4 weeks, respectively, enabling differentiation between vaccinated and naturally infected animals [14].

The Geography of Success: European and North American Experiences

The most compelling evidence for ORV efficacy comes from large-scale, sustained programs in Europe and North America. Estonia stands as a paradigmatic example: after launching biannual ORV campaigns in 2005 using SAG2 baits, rabies cases plummeted from 266 in 2005 to just four in 2007, with no indigenous cases detected after 2008 except for a few incursions near the Russian border [19]. This success was attributed to high bait uptake (85–93% tetracycline positivity in foxes) and consistent seroconversion rates (34–55%) [19]. In contrast, neighboring Latvia and Lithuania, despite comparable ORV efforts, have not achieved elimination, highlighting that program duration, bait density, and cross-border coordination are critical determinants of success [19].

In North America, ORV has been the primary tool for containing the raccoon rabies epizootic that spread from the mid-Atlantic states through the eastern seaboard. The US Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services program deploys V-RG baits along an "Appalachian Ridge" to prevent westward spread of the raccoon variant [37]. The program has also been used to manage the south-central skunk variant, though with less uniform success due to the aforementioned species-specific barriers [5]. A 2-year culling campaign against vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) in Peru failed to reduce rabies spillover to livestock, despite reducing bat density, and was associated with increased viral spatial spread due to culling-induced changes in bat dispersal [35]. This finding reinforces the superiority of vaccination over lethal control in managing wildlife rabies.

Emerging Frontiers: Transmissible Vaccines and Trap-Vaccinate-Release

Despite the successes of conventional ORV, substantial gaps remain. No effective oral vaccine exists for bats, which are the primary reservoirs in the Americas and are implicated in the majority of human rabies cases in the United States [7, 12, 13]. The development of a transmissible vaccine, using a benign viral vector that spreads autonomously through bat populations, offers a paradigm-shifting solution. A betaherpesvirus found in vampire bats is a promising candidate vector for a self-disseminating rabies vaccine. Epidemiological modeling using field-derived genomic data predicts that such a vaccine could achieve high coverage and long-term prevention of rabies outbreaks in bat colonies, potentially bypassing the need for direct bait delivery to these elusive animals [39].

For species refractory to ORV, such as skunks in urban environments, trap-vaccinate-release (TVR) remains a viable, albeit labor-intensive, alternative. In Flagstaff, Arizona, TVR has been used since 2001 to contain cross-species transmission of bat rabies virus variants into skunks. Captured animals receive a parenteral inactivated vaccine, are marked for identification, and are released at the capture site. This approach has proven safe and effective in preventing spillover events in a localized urban interface [8].

The Threat of Disrupted Vaccination: War, Conflict, and Public Health Infrastructure

The vulnerability of ORV programs to societal disruption is starkly illustrated by the ongoing war in Ukraine. Prior to the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022, coordinated ORV campaigns and systematic domestic animal vaccination had contributed to a steady decline in rabies incidence. The invasion caused a collapse of veterinary infrastructure, disrupted vaccination logistics, and led to the displacement of millions of people and animals. Consequently, rabies cases among animals more than doubled between 2022 and 2024. The Ivano-Frankivsk region, geographically distant from the front lines, experienced a doubling of cases by 2024, with the case count already reaching pre-war levels by mid-2025 [38]. A similar pattern emerged in the Lviv region, where cases increased fivefold between 2021 and 2024 [28]. These data provide a stark warning: ORV is not merely a technical intervention but a system embedded within robust public health and veterinary infrastructure. Its gains are fragile and can be rapidly reversed by conflict, economic collapse, or political instability.

Surveillance and Adaptive Management

The sustainability of ORV programs depends on integrated surveillance that combines case detection, genetic characterization of circulating viruses, and serological monitoring of reservoir populations. The US National Rabies Surveillance System (NRSS) provides a model for county-level terrestrial rabies freedom classification. A zero-inflated negative binomial model developed from 14,642 raccoon and 30,120 skunk county-years demonstrated that counties meeting the historical criteria for rabies freedom (no cases in the previous 5 years, with adequate testing) had a 99.2% negative predictive value for detecting cases in the following year [10]. This statistical framework enables public health authorities to make evidence-based decisions regarding post-exposure prophylaxis recommendations and resource allocation.

Critically, surveillance must be adaptive to host shifting and the emergence of novel reservoir species. Trait-based models have identified 44 carnivore and 34 bat species with physiological and ecological profiles suggesting their capacity to serve as RABV reservoirs, even if they are not currently recognized as such [4]. Examples of such emergence include the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica) in Mexico, the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in China, and the Taiwanese ferret badger (Melogale moschata), all of which have been implicated in recent spillover events [2, 32, 34]. The detection of rabies in these novel hosts underscores the need for ongoing genomic surveillance to identify cross-species transmission events and to ensure that current ORV strategies remain aligned with the evolving epidemiological landscape [4, 23]. Only through a sustained, multidisciplinary commitment to ORV, supported by rigorous science, robust infrastructure, and international cooperation, can the goal of eliminating rabies from its wildlife reservoirs be realized.

Emerging Wildlife Reservoirs and the Challenge of Rabies Elimination in Latin America

The successful elimination of canine-mediated human rabies across much of Latin America, culminating in the World Health Organization (WHO) and Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) recognition of countries such as Mexico as the first to eliminate dog-transmitted human rabies, has fundamentally altered the epidemiological landscape of the region [34]. This monumental public health achievement, driven by mass dog vaccination campaigns and robust surveillance, has paradoxically unveiled a more intractable and ecologically complex challenge: the expanding and diversifying sylvatic cycle of rabies virus (RABV). Latin America is now confronting a paradigm shift, where the primary threat to both human and animal health originates not from the domestic dog, but from a growing roster of wildlife reservoirs, most notably hematophagous bats and an array of emerging terrestrial carnivores. The persistence of RABV within these wildlife populations, coupled with the continent’s extraordinary biodiversity and complex human-wildlife-livestock interfaces, renders traditional control strategies insufficient and demands a fundamental re-evaluation of rabies elimination frameworks.

The Dominance and Dynamism of Bat-Borne Rabies

Bats constitute the most significant and evolutionarily ancient reservoir for RABV in the Americas, a region unique in the world for the occurrence of bat rabies [7]. While insectivorous and frugivorous bats contribute to the viral pool, the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) stands as the principal source of spillover events to humans and livestock, particularly in the vast, remote reaches of the Amazon basin and other neotropical regions [18, 35]. The epizootiology of vampire bat rabies is characterized by distinct geographic structuring, indicating that the virus circulates within discrete bat subpopulations with localized transmission cycles that spread gradually across the landscape [18]. This spatial complexity is a critical challenge for intervention. A seminal study in Peru, employing Bayesian state-space models and viral whole-genome sequencing, demonstrated that long-term, spatially extensive culling of vampire bats, a decades-old practice intended to control rabies, failed to reduce spillover into livestock, despite measurably reducing bat population density [35]. This counterintuitive finding directly challenges the foundational assumption of density-dependent transmission that underpins culling as a strategy. More troublingly, the study revealed that reactive culling, implemented after virus arrival, actually accelerated the spatial spread of RABV, likely by inducing perturbations in bat social structure and promoting increased dispersal and inter-colony contact [35]. This suggests that poorly designed interventions can actively exacerbate the very problem they aim to solve, creating an evolutionary and epidemiological feedback loop that facilitates viral invasion. The identification of Myotis bats as potential ancestral spreaders of much of the RABV diversity in the Americas further underscores the deep evolutionary roots of this reservoir and the potential for cross-species transmission (CST) events, which are influenced by host genetic similarity and geographic overlap [7].

Emerging Terrestrial Reservoirs: The Case of the White-Nosed Coati

While bats dominate the sylvatic cycle, a growing body of evidence points to the emergence of terrestrial mammals as significant, and previously overlooked, RABV reservoirs. The white-nosed coati (Nasua narica) in Mexico provides a compelling case study. Following the official elimination of dog-transmitted human rabies in Mexico, the proportion of human cases attributable to wildlife rose to 92% between 2000 and 2018, with mustelids (including coatis) and chiropterans being the primary sources [33]. A comprehensive retrospective analysis of diagnostic records from the Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos (InDRE) from 1993 to 2022 identified 13 rabies cases in white-nosed coatis across five Mexican states, Estado de Mexico, Jalisco, Quintana Roo, Sonora, and Yucatan [34]. Crucially, antigenic and genetic characterization of nine available samples confirmed the presence of RABV in these animals, providing direct evidence that coatis are not merely incidental spillover hosts but can maintain and potentially transmit the virus. This challenges the historical perception of coatis as unimportant vectors and elevates them to a status requiring systematic surveillance [34]. The implications are profound: a generalist, social, and increasingly synanthropic mesocarnivore is now suspected to play a significant role in maintaining the wild cycle of rabies in southeastern Mexico, an area of high biodiversity and tourism that creates frequent interfaces for potential human exposure.

This emergence is not an isolated phenomenon but aligns with a broader, trait-based predictive framework. A study using gradient boosting machine learning models identified key physiological and ecological traits associated with being a RABV reservoir, including phylogenetic similarity to known reservoirs, larger litters, and earlier sexual maturity for carnivores [4]. The model flagged 44 carnivore and 34 bat species not currently recognized as reservoirs that possess trait profiles conducive to RABV maintenance [4]. The white-nosed coati, with its social structure, reproductive strategy, and broad geographic range, fits this profile perfectly. This suggests that the emergence of coatis as a reservoir is not a random event but a predictable consequence of the ecological niche they occupy, underscoring the utility of predictive modeling for preemptive surveillance and control planning.

Biological Mechanisms and Transmission Ecology in Wildlife

Understanding the biological mechanisms that enable RABV perpetuation in these novel wildlife hosts is critical for designing effective interventions. The virus employs a variety of transmission routes beyond the classic bite wound. In wildlife, intraspecific and interspecific fights, communal grooming, regurgitative feeding, and aerosol secretion are all plausible routes of dissemination [33]. A particularly intriguing mechanism is the potential for vertical transmission, specifically from infected offspring to the mother. Research using the historical mouse inoculation test (MIT) has demonstrated that lactating mice can become infected by their inoculated pups, suggesting that "litter-to-mother" transmission could serve as a mechanism for viral persistence, allowing RABV to bridge gaps between epizootic cycles within a social group [33]. If this phenomenon occurs in free-ranging wildlife such as coatis or skunks, it would represent a powerful and cryptic mechanism for viral maintenance that is not targeted by conventional vaccination strategies.

Furthermore, the efficiency of viral shedding varies among reservoir species, a critical factor in assessing spillover risk. During a large-scale skunk rabies epizootic in northern Colorado, RABV was isolated from the salivary glands of 84% of infected striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) and 71% of other carnivores [5]. This high rate of infectiousness in reservoir species confirms that once infected, they pose a significant and consistent secondary transmission risk. The challenge in Latin America is that the diversity of potential reservoir species, ranging from coatis and skunks to foxes, jackals, and even mongooses on islands like Puerto Rico, means that the transmission dynamics and public health threat are highly heterogeneous and context-dependent [5, 14]. For instance, in Puerto Rico, the small Indian mongoose (Urva auropunctata) accounts for over 70% of animal rabies cases, and serosurveys indicate dynamic population-level rabies virus-neutralizing antibody (RVNA) prevalence that varies significantly by habitat type [14, 25].

The Challenge of Eliminating Sylvatic Rabies in Latin America

The emergence of diverse wildlife reservoirs in Latin America poses a formidable challenge to the goal of rabies elimination. The control strategies that proved so effective against canine rabies, mass parenteral vaccination and population management, are logistically impractical or ecologically dangerous for most wildlife. Culling, as evidenced by the vampire bat study, can be counterproductive [35]. Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) has been a cornerstone of wildlife rabies management in Europe and North America, successfully targeting foxes, raccoons, and coyotes [1, 19, 44]. However, its application in Latin America is fraught with hurdles. First, the target species are diverse, and vaccine efficacy is species-specific. The striped skunk, for example, is known to be partially refractory to oral vaccination due to less efficient uptake and primary replication of the vaccine virus in the palatine tonsils compared to the red fox [30]. Second, vaccine delivery in remote, dense, and logistically challenging neotropical environments is difficult. Third, the immunogenicity and bait uptake are poorly understood for many of the newly identified reservoir species, such as the white-nosed coati.

Consequently, novel approaches are imperative. One promising avenue is the development of self-disseminating vaccines. Researchers have proposed using a benign betaherpesvirus that naturally infects vampire bats as a viral vector for a transmissible vaccine. Epidemiological modeling based on field-derived genomic data suggests that such a vaccine could achieve high coverage within bat populations and provide long-term prevention of rabies outbreaks, effectively breaking the transmission cycle without the need for direct human intervention to vaccinate each animal [39]. Other recombinant approaches, such as those using raccoon poxvirus or Newcastle disease virus vectors expressing the rabies glycoprotein, are also being explored for their potential to protect bats and other wildlife species [12, 31]. The successful deployment of such technologies, combined with enhanced genomic surveillance to detect host shifts and emerging variants, will be essential for the next phase of rabies control in the Americas. The region stands at a critical juncture where the success of the past has revealed the complexity of the future, demanding an equally innovative and ecologically informed response.

References

[1] Mazbayeva D, Bulatov Y, Abitaev R, Sametova Z, Toktyrova D. ORAL VACCINE: AS A MEANS OF PREVENTING RABIES IN WILDLIFE. Eurasian journal of applied biotechnology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11134/btp.4.2024.6

[2] Chen S, Bao A, Aodun G, Zhang P, Zhang L, Gao N, et al.. First isolation of rabies virus from a Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in Inner Mongolia, China, 2024. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1598528

[3] Hayes S, Lushasi K, Changalucha J, Czupryna AM, Ferguson E, Lankester F, et al.. Understanding Reservoirs of Multi-Host Pathogens: A One Health Approach to Rabies in Tanzania. One Health Cases. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/onehealthcases.2025.0002

[4] Worsley-Tonks KEL, Escobar L, Biek R, Castaneda-Guzman M, Craft M, Streicker D, et al.. Using host traits to predict reservoir host species of rabies virus. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008940

[5] Jimenez I, Spraker T, Anderson JL, Bowen R, Gilbert A. Isolation of Rabies Virus from the Salivary Glands of Wild and Domestic Carnivores during a Skunk Rabies Epizootic. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7589/2018-05-127

[6] Hussein HA. Major Causes of Rabies Outbreak in Pastoral Areas of the Somali Region and Importance of the One Health Approach. Animal Research and One Health. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.70017

[7] Caraballo DA, Vico ML, Piccirilli MG, Riade SMH, Russo S, Martínez G, et al.. Bat Rabies in the Americas: Is Myotis the Main Ancestral Spreader?. Viruses. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081302

[8] Hastings LA, Bergman DL. A Trap-Vaccinate-Release Protocol for Immunization of Skunks and Additional Rabies Vectors Against Rabies.. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/65117

[9] Singh R, Singh KP, Cherian S, Saminathan M, Kapoor S, Reddy GBM, et al.. Rabies – epidemiology, pathogenesis, public health concerns and advances in diagnosis and control: a comprehensive review. Veterinary Quarterly. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2017.1343516

[10] Kunkel A, Veytsel G, Bonaparte S, Meek HC, Ma X, Davis A, et al.. Defining County-Level Terrestrial Rabies Freedom Using the US National Rabies Surveillance System: Surveillance Data Analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/43061

[11] Rodríguez MC, Fontana D, Garay E, Prieto C. Detection and quantification of anti-rabies glycoprotein antibodies: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11515-4

[12] Malavé CM, Lopera-Madrid J, Medina-Magües LG, Rocke T, Osorio J. Impact of Molecular Modifications on the Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Recombinant Raccoon Poxvirus-Vectored Rabies Vaccine Candidates in Mice. Vaccines. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121436

[13] Childs J, Krebs J, Rupprecht C. Mammalian Reservoirs And The Changing Epidemiology of Rabies In The United States. . 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/v418110143

[14] Berentsen A, Sugihara R, Payne CG, Leinbach IL, Volker S, Vos A, et al.. Analysis of Iophenoxic Acid Analogues in Small Indian Mongoose (Herpestes Auropunctatus) Sera for Use as an Oral Rabies Vaccination Biological Marker.. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/59373

[15] Zajac M, Garanzini D, Pérez O, Calamante G. Recombinant Veterinary Vaccines Against Rabies: State of Art and Perspectives. . 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814966-9.00012-3

[16] Gholami A, Massoudi S, Moghaddam MK, Marashi M, Marashi M, Bashar R, et al.. The Role of the Gray Wolf in Rabies Transmission in Iran and Preliminary Assessment of an Oral Rabies Vaccine in this Animal. . 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/JOMMID.5.3.4.56

[17] Oludairo O, Aiyedun J, Olorunshola I, Dibal M, Gungbias A, Ayeni A, et al.. TRANSBOUNDARY DISEASES AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT: AN OVERVIEW. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/BJVM.V14I2.31380

[18] Condori-Condori RE, Streicker D, Cabezas-Sanchez C, Velasco-Villa A. Enzootic and Epizootic Rabies Associated with Vampire Bats, Peru. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1909.130083

[19] Cliquet F, Robardet E, Must K, Laine M, Peik K, Picard-Meyer E, et al.. Eliminating Rabies in Estonia. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001535

[20] Gilbert A, Kohler D, Rigg TD, Fischer J, Spraker T, Fox K, et al.. A Recent Epizootic of Skunk Rabies and Associated Spillover in Northern Colorado, USA. . 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/V426110456

[21] Martin B, Williamson B, Nahar VK, Gruszynski K, Sharma M, Johnson JW. Qualitative Case Study of Public Health Preparedness and Response to the Rabid Raccoon Discovered in Wise County, Virginia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5734590

[22] Wang L, Tang Q, Liang G. Rabies and rabies virus in wildlife in mainland China, 1990-2013.. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.04.016

[23] Khoane OA, Ngoepe E, Sabeta C, Mphuti N, Syakalima M. Genetic and antigenic characterization of rabies viruses reveals transmission to cattle from both domestic and wildlife species in the North West province, South Africa. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2025.1706731

[24] Ciołek J, Orłowska A, Smreczak M. Determination of the rabies virus variants circulating in Poland in 2021–2023 and their phylogeny with analysis of the strains in the Mazowieckie and Podkarpackie voivodeships. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0032

[25] Berentsen A, Rivera-Rodriguez MJ, Torres-Toledo FB, Davis A, Chipman R, Gilbert A. RABIES VIRUS SEROSURVEY OF THE SMALL INDIAN MONGOOSE (URVA AUROPUNCTATA) ACROSS MULTIPLE HABITATS IN PUERTO RICO, 2014–21. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-22-00148

[26] Sauvé CC, Berentsen A, Gilbert AT, Llanos SF, Leighton PA. Spatiotemporal overlap and contact rates among small Indian mongooses and free-roaming domestic dogs in Puerto Rico: Implications for rabies virus transmission. bioRxiv. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.11.566690

[27] Fisher C, Streicker D, Schnell M. The spread and evolution of rabies virus: conquering new frontiers. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2018.11

[28] Rudenko O, Malysheva K, Kurtiak B, Pundiak T, Romanovych MS. Rabies in Ukraine: Pathogenesis, diagnostics, and epidemiological trends in the Lviv region. One Health Journal. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/onehealthjournal2025-ii-01

[29] Subotsina I, Darovskych S, Leshkevich AL, Dorofeychik IA, Lyakhovsky AK. Basics of rabies prevention in the Republic of Belarus (review). Veterinary Science Today. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196x-2025-14-3-223-231

[30] Vos A, Freuling C, Hundt B, Kaiser C, Nemitz S, Neubert A, et al.. Oral vaccination of wildlife against rabies: Differences among host species in vaccine uptake efficiency.. Vaccine. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.022

[31] Murr M, Freuling C, Pérez-Bravo D, Grund C, Mettenleiter T, Römer-Oberdörfer A, et al.. Immune response after oral immunization of goats and foxes with an NDV vectored rabies vaccine candidate. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011639

[32] Lan Y, Wen T, Chang C, Liu H, Lee P, Huang C, et al.. Indigenous Wildlife Rabies in Taiwan: Ferret Badgers, a Long Term Terrestrial Reservoir. BioMed Research International. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5491640

[33] Aréchiga-Ceballos N, Almazán-Marín CE, Aguilar-Setién Á. Rabies virus litter-to-mother vertical transmission, a phenomenon that could preserve the virus in wildlife reservoirs. Gaceta de M�xico. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.m19000266

[34] Puebla-Rodríguez P, Almazán-Marín CE, Garcés-Ayala F, Rendón-Franco E, Chávez-López S, Gómez-Sierra M, et al.. Rabies virus in white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica) in Mexico: what do we know so far?. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1090222

[35] Viana M, Benavides JA, Broos A, Loayza DI, Niño R, Bone J, et al.. Effects of culling vampire bats on the spatial spread and spillover of rabies virus. Science Advances. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add7437

[36] Pangestiningsih TW, Ariana A, Padeta I, Jadi AR, Wendo WD. Distribusi neuron serotonergik pada hipokampus Lasiwen (Myotis sp) sebagai satwa liar yang berpotensi menjadi reservoir virus rabies. Jurnal Sain Veteriner. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/JSV.42914

[37] Hopken MW, Piaggio AJ, Abdo Z, Chipman R, Mankowski C, Nelson KM, et al.. Are rabid raccoons (Procyon lotor) ready for the rapture? Determining the geographic origin of rabies virus‐infected raccoons using RADcapture and microhaplotypes. Evolutionary Applications. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13613

[38] Bayliak M. The prevalence of rabies in Ukraine during the war, with a focus on the Ivano-Frankivsk region. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. Biology. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnubio.13.6-17

[39] Griffiths ME, Meza DK, Haydon D, Streicker D. Inferring the disruption of rabies circulation in vampire bat populations using a betaherpesvirus-vectored transmissible vaccine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216667120

[40] Wallau GdL, Barbier E, Machado LC, Silva AFd, Dias YJM, Tomazatos A, et al.. Ambecovirus, a novel Betacoronavirus subgenus circulating in neotropical bats, sheds new light on bat-borne coronaviruses evolution. bioRxiv. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veaf094

[41] Andrew CL, Henaff M, Fehlner-Gardiner C, Thang C, Knowles M, Jung T, et al.. Where have all the rabies cases gone? Results of rabies virus surveillance in wildlife in the Yukon, Canada. Arctic Science. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2024-0034

[42] Calabuig C, Dantas A, Katzenberger M, Souza H, Sombra C, Megid J, et al.. Assessment of Rabies and Canine Distemper Viruses in Road-Killed Wildlife Mammals From the Semiarid Region of Northeastern Brazil. Tropical Conservation Science. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919875446

[43] Moore S, Gilbert A, Vos A, Freuling C, Ellis CK, Kliemt J, et al.. Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed2030031

[44] Berezkin V, Aidiev A. Oral vaccination of wildlife against rabies and problems of monitoring immunity levels in an urban area (Saint Petersburg). Legal regulation in veterinary medicine. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2782-6252.2025.4.50

[45] Šnytová J, Cristian A, Codreanu M. Data on the prevalence of rabies cases in foxes in Romania between 2020 and 2024. Practica Veterinara ro. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26416/pv.49.3.2025.11051