Grouper Iridovirus: Virology, Pathogenesis, Immune Evasion, and Control Strategies

Introduction

Grouper iridovirus, particularly the Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV), is a highly pathogenic double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the family Iridoviridae and the genus Ranavirus [1, 2]. SGIV infection causes severe systemic disease in cultured groupers (Epinephelus spp.), with mortality rates exceeding 90% within one week of infection [3, 4]. The virus has been responsible for catastrophic economic losses in the aquaculture industries of China, Southeast Asia, and other mariculture regions [5, 6]. Outbreaks are characterized by hemorrhage, splenomegaly, and darkened spleen, with rapid transmission among larval and juvenile stages [7, 8]. The global spread of iridovirids, including SGIV, threatens biodiversity and food security [9, 10]. Understanding the molecular virology, host-pathogen interactions, and diagnostic approaches is critical for developing effective control strategies.

Taxonomy and Genomic Organization

SGIV is a member of the genus Ranavirus within the family Iridoviridae, which comprises large cytoplasmic DNA viruses infecting ectothermic vertebrates [11, 12]. The SGIV genome is approximately 140 kb in length and contains 120 to 162 open reading frames (ORFs), depending on the strain [13, 14]. The orange-spotted grouper iridovirus Hainan strain (OSGIV-HN-2018-001) was recently sequenced and has a genome of 110,699 bp encoding 122 ORFs, with close phylogenetic affinity to ISKNV-ASB-23 [15]. Grouper iridovirus (GIV), isolated from Taiwan, has a genome of 139,793 bp and 120 ORFs [16]. Comparative genomics reveals that ranaviruses share core genes encoding major capsid protein (MCP), DNA polymerase, and immediate-early regulatory proteins, while also harboring unique ORFs involved in immune evasion [17, 18]. The MCP is the most abundant structural protein and is frequently used as a target for molecular diagnostics [19, 20].

Virion Structure

Cryo-electron microscopy and tomography have resolved the near-atomic architecture of SGIV, revealing a T=247 icosahedral capsid approximately 220 nm in diameter [21, 22]. The capsid comprises eight types of capsid proteins, including MCP and multiple minor capsid proteins (mCPs) that form distinct building blocks [21]. An inner lipid bilayer membrane is present beneath the capsid, and anchor proteins integrate the membrane with the capsid [22]. The inner membrane biogenesis is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), as evidenced by colocalization of an anchor protein with ER markers [21]. Segmentation of cryo-EM maps using tools such as iSeg has allowed extraction of individual layers and comparative modeling of MCP [23]. The structural data provide targets for vaccine design and antiviral drug development [21].

Replication Cycle

SGIV enters host cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis, as demonstrated by single-particle tracking and pharmacological inhibition studies [24, 25]. The major capsid protein interacts with clathrin light chain a (CLCa) to facilitate internalization [26]. After entry, viral particles are transported to early endosomes (EEs) in a Rab5-dependent manner, followed by maturation to late endosomes (LES) mediated by Rab7 [27, 28]. Live-cell imaging reveals that SGIV movement within EEs is characterized by "slow-fast-slow" stages as it travels from the cell membrane to the nucleus [27]. The virus hijacks host Rab1 to promote trafficking to early endosomes while simultaneously disrupting STING-IRF3 signaling [29]. Following uncoating, viral DNA replication occurs in distinct cytoplasmic viral factories (viral assembly sites or VAS) that form adjacent to the nucleus [30]. The VAS contains membranous precursors that recruit capsid proteins to form crescent-shaped structures, which curve to form icosahedral capsids [30]. DNA encapsidation occurs as electron-dense material fills the capsid [30]. Virions bud from the plasma membrane or into tubular vacuoles, the latter potentially representing a novel dissemination strategy that evades immune detection [30]. Host lipid metabolism is reprogrammed to support replication: glycerophospholipids, especially arachidonic acid, are elevated, and cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) is essential for viral replication [31]. Glucose metabolism is also induced via mTOR signaling, with upregulation of GLUT1 and key glycolytic enzymes [32].

flowchart TD
    A[SGIV attachment to host cell], > B[Clathrin-mediated endocytosis]
    B, > C[Early endosome transport Rab5/Rab1]
    C, > D[Maturation to late endosome Rab7]
    D, > E[Uncoating and release of viral DNA]
    E, > F[Formation of viral assembly site VAS]
    F, > G[Capsid assembly and DNA encapsidation]
    G, > H[Budding via plasma membrane or vacuoles]
    H, > I[Release of progeny virions]

Host Range and Pathogenesis

SGIV naturally infects a range of marine fish, including orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides), giant grouper (E. lanceolatus), and hybrid grouper (E. fuscoguttatus × E. lanceolatus) [33, 34]. Experimental infection of mandarin fish brain cells also produces cytopathic effects [15]. Clinical signs include lethargy, anorexia, hemorrhage of fins and skin, and pronounced splenomegaly with blackening of the spleen [7, 8]. Histopathological examination reveals degeneration and necrosis in spleen, liver, kidney, and intestine, with viral inclusion bodies [35, 36]. SGIV induces paraptosis-like cell death in vitro, distinct from the autophagy and necrosis caused by RGNNV [37]. The virus also disrupts intestinal barrier integrity and alters gut microbiota composition [38]. High stocking density and feeding frequency influence susceptibility to SGIV in hybrid grouper [39].

Immune Evasion Mechanisms

SGIV encodes multiple proteins that antagonize the host interferon (IFN) response, particularly the STING-TBK1-IRF3 and cGAS-STING pathways. The viral protein VP018 interacts with STING, TBK1, and IRF3, leading to their degradation and disruption of STING-TBK1 and TBK1-IRF3 complexes, thereby reducing IRF3 nuclear translocation [2]. VP20 targets TBK1 and IRF3, and degrades IRF3 via the proteasome pathway [40]. VP128 localizes to the ER and inhibits STING-TBK1 signaling by interacting with both EcSTING and EcTBK1 [41]. VP131 degrades STING through both autophagy-lysosome and ubiquitin-proteasome pathways, and inhibits IFN induction [42]. VP122 interacts with STING and prevents its self-interaction [43]. VP146 modulates cGAS-STING signaling by interacting with cGAS, STING, TBK1, and IRF3, but does not affect STING-TBK1 binding [44]. VP12 escapes cGAS-STING by interacting with cGAS and degrading TBK1 and IRF3 [45]. Additionally, SGIV VP82 degrades IRF3 and IRF7 [46]. Beyond the IFN axis, SGIV inhibits autophagy by increasing cytoplasmic p53 and encoding viral proteins (VP48, VP122, VP132) that competitively bind Atg5 [47]. The virus also encodes a Bcl-2 homolog (GIV66) that specifically sequesters the pro-apoptotic protein Bim, inhibiting apoptosis [48]. Host microRNAs are manipulated: miR-124 promotes viral replication by targeting JNK3/p38α MAPK [49]; miR-181c inhibits infection by targeting PDCD4 [50]; miR-146a promotes infection by regulating apoptosis and NF-κB [51]. Long non-coding RNAs and circular RNAs are also differentially expressed during SGIV infection, suggesting complex regulatory networks [52, 53].

Diagnostic Methods

Rapid and sensitive detection of SGIV is essential for disease control. Conventional PCR targeting the MCP gene is widely used [54]. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays have been developed for SGIV, and a triple visual LAMP method simultaneously detects SGIV, Vibrio harveyi, and V. parahaemolyticus with sensitivity as low as 100 fg/μL and a detection time of 30 minutes [55]. Lateral flow biosensors (LFBs) using DNA aptamers (Q2 and Q3) can detect SGIV-infected cells within 90 minutes with high specificity, requiring no sophisticated equipment [56]. Aptamer-based enzyme-linked apta-sorbent assays (ELASA) and fluorescent molecular probes (e.g., Q5c) have also been established [57, 58]. An activatable aptamer probe Q2c was recently reported for grouper iridovirus detection [59]. For antibody detection, polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against GIV proteins such as ORF5L and ORF120L have been generated and used in immunofluorescence assays [60, 61]. High-throughput sequencing and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) enable quantitative viral load determination [62]. Diagnostic workflow often integrates clinical signs, histopathology, and molecular confirmation.

Vaccines and Antivirals

Several vaccine platforms have been evaluated against SGIV. Inactivated whole virus vaccines formulated with Montanide IMS 1312 adjuvant administered by immersion yielded a relative percent survival (RPS) of 57.69% [63]. DNA vaccines encoding MCP, especially when fused with lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1), achieved up to 91% protection in orange-spotted grouper [64]. Subunit vaccines incorporating interleukin-15-like (EcIL-15L) as a cytokine adjuvant significantly improved antibody titers and protection [3]. Oral delivery using Bacillus subtilis spores displaying VP19 protein provided 34.5% survival and reduced viral loads [65]. Multi-epitope vaccine designs based on immuno-bioinformatics approaches have been proposed for GIV [66]. Chimeric recombinant vaccines combining GIV-R (Ranavirus-type) with nervous necrosis virus (NNV) coat protein conferred dual protection [67]. Bivalent inactivated vaccines for broodfish reduce vertical transmission risk [68].

A wide range of natural compounds exhibit anti-SGIV activity. Epicatechin, quercetin, kaempferol, eugenol, curcumin, edaravone, berberine, matrine, oridonin, and polysaccharides from Spirulina platensis and marine fungi have demonstrated in vitro and in vivo efficacy through mechanisms including direct virucidal effects, inhibition of viral entry and replication, modulation of interferon and inflammatory pathways, and reduction of oxidative stress [1, 8, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75]. Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens E35 shows prophylactic potential when fed to fish, reducing mortality and viral loads [76]. Curcumin also protects against SGIV-induced intestinal and liver injury by enhancing tight junction integrity and Nrf2 signaling [38, 77]. Green tea components, particularly tea polyphenols and EGCG, inhibit SGIV with up to 99% reduction in MCP gene expression [78]. Metformin and other metabolic modulators that target glycolysis or lipid metabolism also suppress SGIV replication [79, 80].

Conclusion

Grouper iridovirus remains a formidable pathogen in marine aquaculture, with considerable economic and ecological impact. Advances in structural virology have clarified the capsid architecture and assembly process [21, 22]. The molecular dissection of immune evasion strategies reveals how SGIV disables STING-TBK1-IRF3 and cGAS-STING pathways, providing potential targets for therapeutic intervention [2, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45]. Aptamer-based diagnostics and LAMP methods enable rapid, field-deployable detection [55, 56]. Vaccines, including DNA and oral formulations, show promise, while natural compounds offer a reservoir of antiviral candidates [1, 63, 64, 65, 69]. Integrated management combining surveillance, vaccination, immunostimulation, and biosecurity is essential for sustainable grouper farming. Future research should focus on elucidating the role of epigenetic modifications and host metabolic reprogramming, and on translating laboratory findings into practical aquaculture interventions.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to substitute for professional veterinary advice, diagnosis, treatment, or regulatory guidance. Always consult a licensed veterinarian or qualified specialist regarding animal health, disease diagnosis, and therapeutic decisions.

References

[1] Lin Huang, Jihui Kuang, Jieying Yu et al. Antiviral activity of epicatechin against Singapore grouper iridovirus in vitro and in vivo. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ebac2333f787a77ccb9424e2efcca395a76736cc

[2] Wenji Wang, Linyong Zhi, Shanxing Liu et al. Singapore grouper iridovirus VP018 abrogates the interferon response by targeting STING-TBK1-IRF3 axis. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/884c04296e960d9faf14658b078040d9f9351627

[3] Jiaying Zheng, Haotian Chen, Qiting Liu et al. Grouper Interleukin 15-Like acts as a cytokine adjuvant in grouper iridovirus subunit vaccine. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60747fb87e1067fd1bf6984d269c0ddb21d9fda6

[4] Zhiwen Zhao, Jia Cai, Shaowen Wang et al. EcSnx27 facilitates in vitro release of Singapore grouper iridovirus and interacts with its major capsid protein. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/051d87720cafc5d84c31e0e3fdbddd6bfa70650a

[5] Chu-Fan Cheng, Hsiang-Chieh Chuang, Yu-Shen Lai. Characterization and Antibody Preparation of the Gene Products of Grouper Iridovirus ORF5L. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e780fc7ac85d37b3d5bab2c5a5b9fd3a21bfcb74

[6] Widodo et al. Modulatory Effect of Inducing Iridovirus DNA Vaccine Combining Different CpG ODN Adjuvant in the Systemic Immune Mechanism Underlying the Protection Against Grouper Iridovirus of Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer). Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1af11d4abfe9b365d3870dbc70ba2685995298bd

[7] Lingfeng Guan, Xinyue Zhang, Zhenghong Xu et al. Singapore grouper iridovirus utilizes Rab1 to facilitate viral trafficking and evade the immune response by targeting the STING-IRF3 pathway. Cell Communication and Signaling, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9857ae4fad8359927e68d9e0ea7f9eed1726e0bd

[8] Yewen Wang, Yun-Feng Jiang, Jiatao Chen et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity of Eugenol on Singapore Grouper Iridovirus. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1d7dddda98c96bcb47a4e80ffb8ac597fe9532e

[9] Chu-Fan Cheng, Hsiang-Chieh Chuang, Yu-Shen Lai. Characterization and antibody preparation of the gene products of grouper iridovirus ORF120L. Virus Research, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5d4f456e46cadd3ee5cbcd46ae8db91fb7978ae

[10] Mingzhu Liu, Jing Huang, Lin Huang et al. An activatable aptamer probe Q2c for detection of grouper iridovirus. Aquaculture, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77c38bc7510bdbaf9dd45ed012e008d632928c60

[11] Chu-Fan Cheng, Hsiang-Chieh Chuang, Yu-Shen Lai. Corrigendum to 'Characterization and antibody preparation of the gene products of grouper iridovirus ORF120L'. Virus Research, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bfb345be03d2aabda450a5f40a02b08182c28f8

[12] Yu-Rong Lei, Jia-Yang He, Xue Fu et al. Epinephelus coioides Sec3 promotes Singapore grouper iridovirus infection by negatively regulates immune response. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39187889f20d145e2e02e81c8aa2b76cbd067c29

[13] Tao Li, Ronggang Ding, Jing Zhang et al. The Establishment of the Multi-Visual Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for the Rapid Detection of Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Singapore grouper iridovirus. Fishes, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9207fb83cd454a0f343685086eb2498ee1f5c3c3

[14] Shanxing Liu, Y. Wang, Wenji Wang et al. Singapore grouper iridovirus VP20 interacts with grouper TBK1 and IRF3 to attenuate the interferon immune response. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c82eceabd7a82cc1418dea0104641412fa300e1

[15] Zhouling Zhan, Hong Chen, Xinyu Liao et al. Singapore grouper iridovirus VP128 inhibits STING-TBK1 mediated signaling to evade antiviral immunity. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23c6015847ee0671268adf159f8c8c7ba616fa11

[16] Weihua Xu, Mengke Liu, Qiwei Qin et al. Evaluation of protective immune response of immersion inactivated vaccine against Singapore grouper iridovirus. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf61a110d46cdd0b654a30c626e96d2e0e8ac54d

[17] Linting Xu, Qiongyue Xu, Weifu Mo et al. Singapore grouper iridovirus VP146 modulates the cGAS-STING signaling pathway to escape the interferon immune response. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3742380d2d44bb1eb4a8ad792c5b6a94ffc67ade

[18] Helong Cao, Dongzhuo Zhang, Guanghui Mu et al. Isolation, Identification and Genomic Analysis of Orange-Spotted Grouper Iridovirus Hainan Strain in China. Viruses, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5eab21c8570c1e88f36fe84c95cde8d06b4c6c99

[19] Luhao Zhang, Linting Xu, Xin Zhang et al. Singapore grouper iridovirus VP12 evades the host antiviral immune response by targeting the cGAS-STING signalling pathway. Journal of General Virology, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7bd8e800e5bd9cdf8792a409ffd1ff51fc11808

[20] A. Chuard, K. Nesarajah, K. Danazumi et al. Viral Insulin/IGF-like Peptides Selectively Activate Host Insulin/IGF Signaling pathways during Grouper Iridovirus Infection. bioRxiv, 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f47c8565e8afb2541840f035d604d6082b8ec6d

[21] Zhennan Zhao, Youhua Huang, Congcong Liu et al. Near-atomic architecture of Singapore grouper iridovirus and implications for giant virus assembly. Nature Communications, 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7966b457d44c37e220b0d33302a9b3c9ea76c042

[22] G. Pintilie, Dong-Hua Chen, B. Tran et al. Segmentation and Comparative Modeling in an 8.6Å Cryo-EM map of the Singapore Grouper Iridovirus. Structure, 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/401b52717600ba61693a3dec70c060023d13c627

[23] Xia Liang, Jun Liang, J M Cao et al. Oral immunizations with Bacillus subtilis spores displaying VP19 protein provide protection against Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) infection in grouper. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea0755eb70807c3debdcbe2751585f94c2377d20

[24] Liqun Wang, Qiang Li, Xiao-wei Wen et al. Dissecting the early and late endosomal pathways of Singapore grouper iridovirus by single-particle tracking in living cells. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b298ab85103a34ae780ea3dedf549e93fbaa761

[25] Qing Yu, Mingzhu Liu, Siting Wu et al. Specific Aptamer-Based Probe for Analyzing Biomarker MCP Entry Into Singapore Grouper Iridovirus-Infected Host Cells via Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccfadd6fc1be03679ace3167b2d35af2561d7972

[26] Liqun Wang, Qiang Li, S. Ni et al. The roles of grouper clathrin light chains in regulating the infection of a novel marine DNA virus, Singapore grouper iridovirus. Scientific Reports, 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f81f80a88f447c9c3da3641ad9dffdd34d9e75d

[27] Liqun Wang, Chen Li, Xinyue Zhang et al. The Small GTPase Rab5c Exerts Bi-Function in Singapore Grouper Iridovirus Infections and Cellular Responses in the Grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Frontiers in Immunology, 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07588b2f88932e27cc052bf99249d61214781d8a

[28] Yang Liu, B. Tran, Fan Wang et al. Visualization of Assembly Intermediates and Budding Vacuoles of Singapore Grouper Iridovirus in Grouper Embryonic Cells. Scientific Reports, 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4767ad6c58edd7eb50f08e43de82d9514f2f90f

[29] N. Ni, Jiaying Zheng, Wenji Wang et al. Singapore Grouper Iridovirus Disturbed Glycerophospholipids Homeostasis: Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 Was Essential for Virus Replication. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97d08c43f9235295baa31d83880a373f681f6b81

[30] Xixi Guo, Qiaojun Zheng, Zanbin Pan et al. Singapore Grouper Iridovirus Induces Glucose Metabolism in Infected Cells by Activation of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d24e8d28814c0ca88807243fbfc35daebceb766d

[31] Hsiang-Chieh Chuang, Tsung-Yu Yang, Jin-Feng Tsai et al. Effect of stocking density and feeding frequency on nervous necrosis virus and iridovirus susceptibility in hybrid grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus ♂×Epinephelus fuscoguttatus ♀). Aquaculture Reports, 2025. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5ae7b9b700c495b6b42cb27f9e2fcd3e9b17c22

[32] Yuexuan Wang, Suifeng Xu, Yewen Wang et al. Curcumin Alleviates Singapore Grouper Iridovirus-Induced Intestine Injury in Orange-Spotted Grouper (Epinephelus coioides). Antioxidants, 2023. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9a53c874d7f9b3aed25316c8f45c985246134cc

[33] Xixi Guo, Wenji Wang, Qiaojun Zheng et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals different host cell responses to Singapore grouper iridovirus and red-spotted grouper nervous necrosis virus. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/467c88396d0b95bca4a262bc1c5d0103b418e918

[34] Chen Li, Liqun Wang, Jiaxin Liu et al. Singapore Grouper Iridovirus (SGIV) Inhibited Autophagy for Efficient Viral Replication. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4d1a9d53067adafe70718628178ef3eb958f1d

[35] S. Banjara, Jiahao Mao, T. Ryan et al. Grouper iridovirus G