Pathogens Associated with Undercooked Poultry: Clinical and Microbiological Perspectives

Introduction

The consumption of undercooked poultry represents a major vector for foodborne bacterial infections globally. Poultry meat, particularly chicken, serves as a primary reservoir for several zoonotic pathogens that colonize the avian gastrointestinal tract without causing overt disease in the bird. Inadequate thermal processing fails to achieve the requisite logarithmic reduction of these organisms, leading to human exposure. This review examines the major bacterial pathogens associated with undercooked poultry, their clinical manifestations in both avian and human hosts, diagnostic methodologies, and critical control points for food safety.

Epidemiological data indicate that a substantial proportion of foodborne illness outbreaks originate in domestic kitchens. Consumer practices for assessing poultry doneness, such as visual inspection of meat color or juice clarity, are unreliable indicators of pathogen inactivation [1]. Laboratory studies demonstrate that color change in chicken meat occurs below 60 degrees Celsius, corresponding to less than a 3-log reduction of key pathogens such as Salmonella and Campylobacter [1]. Even at core temperatures of 70 degrees Celsius, pathogens can survive on fillet surfaces not in direct contact with the heating surface [1]. These findings underscore the necessity for objective temperature monitoring using calibrated thermometers rather than heuristic methods.

Major Bacterial Pathogens

Salmonella enterica

Salmonella enterica, particularly non-typhoidal serovars such as Typhimurium and Enteritidis, remains a leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis linked to poultry consumption. Poultry flocks can harbor Salmonella subclinically, with the organism residing in the ceca and contaminating carcasses during slaughter and processing. The infectious dose for humans varies by serovar and host susceptibility but can be as low as 10 to 100 colony-forming units (CFU) for highly susceptible individuals.

Clinical Manifestations in Poultry. In avian species, Salmonella infection may present as pullorum disease (caused by S. Pullorum) or fowl typhoid (caused by S. Gallinarum), both of which are host-specific and cause systemic illness in young birds. However, non-typhoidal serovars typically produce asymptomatic intestinal carriage in adult poultry, making detection reliant on microbiological culture or molecular methods.

Clinical Manifestations in Humans. Salmonellosis in humans typically presents with acute onset of diarrhea, abdominal cramps, fever, and vomiting 6 to 72 hours after ingestion. The diarrhea may be watery or bloody. In immunocompromised individuals, the elderly, and young children, bacteremia and extraintestinal focal infections such as osteomyelitis or septic arthritis can occur [37]. Reactive arthritis is a recognized post-infectious sequela.

Diagnostic Methods. Conventional culture involves pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water, selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis or tetrathionate broth, and plating on selective agars such as xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) or brilliant green agar. Confirmation is achieved through biochemical profiling and serotyping using somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens. Molecular diagnostics, including real-time PCR targeting the invA gene, provide rapid detection with high sensitivity and specificity. Quantitative risk assessment models have demonstrated that both prevalence-based and concentration-based microbiological criteria, when coupled with interventions, can significantly reduce the probability of illness from Salmonella in chicken parts [33].

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

Campylobacter species, particularly C. jejuni and C. coli, are the most frequently reported bacterial causes of human gastroenteritis in many industrialized nations [2, 3]. Poultry is the principal reservoir, with birds carrying high numbers of Campylobacter in their ceca without clinical signs. Contamination of carcasses occurs during processing, and cross-contamination to ready-to-eat foods in domestic kitchens is a significant risk factor [4].

Clinical Manifestations in Poultry. Campylobacter is generally considered a commensal organism in chickens, colonizing the mucus layer of the ceca and colon. However, some studies indicate that high Campylobacter loads can be associated with changes in the cecal microbiome, including decreased Lactobacillus abundance and increased Enterobacteriaceae levels [5]. Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators in chickens has been shown to produce lines with increased resistance to Campylobacter colonization [6].

Clinical Manifestations in Humans. Campylobacteriosis has an incubation period of 2 to 5 days, followed by acute onset of diarrhea (often bloody), abdominal pain, fever, and malaise. The diarrhea results from bacterial adherence to and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells, mediated by adhesins such as CadF and FlpA which bind fibronectin [7]. Cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) causes DNA damage and cell cycle arrest in host cells [8]. Post-infectious sequelae include Guillain-Barre syndrome, a peripheral neuropathy triggered by molecular mimicry between Campylobacter lipooligosaccharides and human gangliosides [38], and reactive arthritis [2].

Diagnostic Methods. Campylobacter is microaerophilic and requires specialized culture conditions (5% oxygen, 10% carbon dioxide, 85% nitrogen) at 42 degrees Celsius on selective media such as modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA). Molecular methods, including PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene or the hipO gene for C. jejuni, offer faster turnaround times. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has become a powerful tool for epidemiological tracing and characterization of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes [9, 10]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) allows for high-resolution typing of isolates and identification of host-associated lineages [9, 11].

Antimicrobial Resistance. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines is increasingly reported in Campylobacter isolates from poultry worldwide [12, 13]. Ciprofloxacin resistance is commonly associated with the Thr-86-Ile mutation in the gyrA gene, while tetracycline resistance is mediated by the tetO gene [12]. The presence of plasmid-borne type VI secretion systems and multiple resistance determinants has been documented in C. coli isolates from retail chicken [10].

Clostridium perfringens

Clostridium perfringens is an anaerobic, spore-forming bacillus that is a common cause of foodborne illness, particularly in association with meat and poultry dishes that have been held at improper temperatures after cooking. Type A strains produce enterotoxin (CPE) which is responsible for the diarrheal illness.

Clinical Manifestations in Poultry. In broiler chickens, C. perfringens is the etiological agent of necrotic enteritis, a disease characterized by necrosis of the intestinal mucosa, leading to decreased performance and mortality. Predisposing factors include dietary changes and concurrent coccidial infections. The pathogenesis involves NetB toxin, a pore-forming toxin that causes enterocyte necrosis. For a detailed discussion of this condition, refer to the article on Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens: Clostridium perfringens Virulence Factors, Gut Microbiome, and Probiotic Control Strategies.

Clinical Manifestations in Humans. C. perfringens type A food poisoning presents with acute onset of watery diarrhea and abdominal cramps 8 to 16 hours after ingestion of contaminated food. Vomiting and fever are uncommon. The illness is typically self-limiting, lasting 24 to 48 hours. The enterotoxin binds to intestinal epithelial cells, causing fluid and electrolyte secretion.

Diagnostic Methods. Diagnosis in foodborne outbreaks relies on the detection of high numbers of C. perfringens in the implicated food (greater than 10^5 CFU/g) and the isolation of the same serotype from stool samples of affected individuals. Quantitative culture on tryptose-sulfite-cycloserine (TSC) agar under anaerobic conditions is standard. PCR detection of the cpe gene confirms enterotoxigenic potential.

Escherichia coli O157:H7

While more commonly associated with beef, Escherichia coli O157:H7 has been documented in poultry and can be transmitted through undercooked poultry meat [14]. This serotype produces Shiga toxins (Stx1 and Stx2) which cause hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in humans. Poultry can acquire the organism through contaminated feed, water, or environmental contact. The infectious dose is extremely low, estimated at fewer than 100 organisms. Clinical signs in humans include severe abdominal cramps, bloody diarrhea, and in a subset of cases, HUS characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure. Diagnostic methods include culture on sorbitol-MacConkey agar (SMAC), where O157:H7 appears as colorless colonies due to its inability to ferment sorbitol, and immunoassays for Shiga toxin detection. PCR targeting stx1, stx2, and the eae gene (intimin) is used for confirmation.

Helicobacter pullorum

Helicobacter pullorum is an emerging zoonotic pathogen that colonizes the intestinal tract of poultry and can contaminate carcasses during processing [15]. It is phylogenetically related to Campylobacter and can be misidentified as such. H. pullorum infection in humans is associated with gastroenteritis and, in some cases, hepatitis [15]. The organism is fastidious and requires microaerophilic conditions for culture. Molecular detection using species-specific PCR targeting the 16S rRNA or urease genes is recommended for accurate identification.

Cross-Contamination Routes

Cross-contamination in domestic kitchens is a critical factor in the transmission of poultry-associated pathogens. A study by Santos-Ferreira et al. demonstrated that cooking salt used for seasoning can serve as a vehicle for Campylobacter spp. transfer from raw chicken to lettuce via unwashed hands [4]. Campylobacter survived in a culturable state in salt for up to 4 hours, and intact cells were observed by transmission electron microscopy after 6 hours [4]. This indirect route highlights the importance of hand hygiene and separation of raw poultry from ready-to-eat foods.

Wooden cutting boards used in wet markets have been shown to harbor a diverse microbiome including Campylobacter fetus, Clostridium perfringens, and Escherichia coli, indicating that hygiene practices are often insufficient to prevent pathogen establishment [16].

Food Safety Critical Control Points

Effective control of pathogens associated with undercooked poultry requires a multi-hurdle approach spanning the farm-to-fork continuum.

Pre-Harvest Interventions

At the farm level, biosecurity measures to prevent introduction of pathogens include all-in-all-out production, rodent and pest control, and chlorination of drinking water. Vaccination strategies have been explored for Campylobacter control in broilers, including live Salmonella-vectored vaccines expressing Campylobacter outer membrane proteins such as CmeC and CfrA [17]. However, oral vaccination has not consistently triggered protective immune responses in chickens [17]. Probiotic and organic acid feed additives have shown in vitro and in vivo efficacy in reducing Campylobacter colonization [18]. Selection of chickens with inherently high pro-inflammatory mediator phenotypes has been associated with increased resistance to Campylobacter colonization [6].

Harvest and Processing

During slaughter, critical control points include scalding temperature and duration, defeathering equipment sanitation, and evisceration technique to minimize fecal contamination. Carcass chilling reduces bacterial loads. Irradiation is an effective processing technology for pathogen reduction, although consumer acceptance is limited by quality concerns such as off-odor development and pink color in cooked meat [19]. Combinations of irradiation with antimicrobial additives such as sodium lactate or natural plant extracts like thymol and carvacrol can enhance pathogen reduction while mitigating quality defects [19, 20].

Post-Harvest and Consumer Handling

Consumer education on proper cooking temperatures is essential. The use of food thermometers to verify that poultry reaches an internal temperature of at least 73.9 degrees Celsius (165 degrees Fahrenheit) is recommended. Current consumer practices, such as checking meat color or juice clarity, are inadequate for ensuring pathogen inactivation [1]. A minority of households use food thermometers, and those available for home use often have long response times [1].

The following Mermaid diagram illustrates a decision tree for food safety management of poultry from processing to consumption.

flowchart TD
    A[Raw Poultry Carcass], > B{Processing Step}
    B, > C[Scalding & Defeathering]
    B, > D[Evisceration]
    B, > E[Carcass Chilling]
    C, > F[Microbial Load Assessment]
    D, > F
    E, > F
    F, > G{Pathogen Detection}
    G, >|Positive| H[Intervention Required]
    G, >|Negative| I[Packaging & Distribution]
    H, > J[Irradiation / Antimicrobial Treatment]
    J, > F
    I, > K[Retail / Consumer]
    K, > L{Cooking Method}
    L, > M[Core Temperature >= 73.9 C]
    L, > N[Core Temperature < 73.9 C]
    M, > O[Safe for Consumption]
    N, > P[Risk of Foodborne Illness]
    P, > Q[Clinical Case / Outbreak Investigation]
    Q, > R[Diagnostic Testing: Culture, PCR, WGS]
    R, > S[Source Attribution & Feedback to Production]

Diagnostic Approaches

Culture-Based Methods

Traditional culture remains the gold standard for pathogen detection in poultry products. For Salmonella, the ISO 6579-1 method involves pre-enrichment, selective enrichment, and plating on selective agars. For Campylobacter, ISO 10272-1 specifies enrichment in Bolton broth followed by plating on mCCDA under microaerophilic conditions. Clostridium perfringens is cultured on TSC agar under anaerobic conditions. These methods provide viable isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and epidemiological typing.

Molecular Diagnostics

Real-time PCR assays offer rapid detection with high sensitivity. Multiplex PCR panels can simultaneously detect Salmonella, Campylobacter, and other pathogens. Quantum dot-based fluorescent immunoassays coupled with magnetic immunoseparation have been developed for rapid and simultaneous detection of Salmonella and Campylobacter in poultry samples [21]. WGS provides comprehensive genetic information for outbreak investigation, virulence gene profiling, and antimicrobial resistance gene detection [9, 10].

Serological Methods

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are used for serological surveillance of Salmonella in poultry flocks, detecting antibodies against lipopolysaccharide or flagellar antigens. For a detailed discussion of ELISA principles, refer to the article on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for Feline Leukemia Virus.

Antimicrobial Resistance

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in poultry-associated pathogens is a significant public health concern. Campylobacter isolates from poultry show high rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline globally [12, 13]. In C. jejuni ST50 isolates from Europe and North America, resistance determinants for beta-lactams, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones have been identified, while Australian isolates lack these determinants, likely due to stricter antibiotic use policies [11]. Salmonella isolates from poultry also exhibit resistance to multiple drug classes, including ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines (ACSSuT phenotype). For a broader perspective on this issue, see the article on Antimicrobial Resistance in Livestock-Associated Staphylococcus aureus: Genomic Epidemiology and One Health Implications.

Conclusions

Undercooked poultry remains a major vehicle for foodborne bacterial pathogens, with Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Clostridium perfringens being the most clinically significant. Effective control requires integrated interventions at all stages of production, processing, and consumer handling. Reliance on visual cues for doneness is insufficient; objective temperature measurement is essential. Advances in molecular diagnostics, including real-time PCR and WGS, have improved detection, typing, and surveillance capabilities. The continued emergence of antimicrobial resistance underscores the need for prudent antibiotic use in poultry production and the development of alternative control strategies such as vaccination, probiotics, and bacteriophage therapy [22].

References

[1] Langsrud S, Sørheim O, Skuland S, et al. Cooking chicken at home: Common or recommended approaches to judge doneness may not assure sufficient inactivation of pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c10563efc9bf5530cbc71dd89a953771783f9d8

[2] Pal M. Campylobacter jejuni: An Emerging Foodborne Pathogen of Global Significance. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a7f289415b7959d5e7e189cf8ebf1f2a1b90af0

[3] Altekruse S, Stern N, Fields P, et al. Campylobacter jejuni-an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 1999. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0098063b11c10cabcb2ff030b8e36630ec695b7

[4] Santos-Ferreira N, Alves Â, Cardoso M, et al. Cross-contamination of lettuce with Campylobacter spp. via cooking salt during handling raw poultry. PLoS ONE. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eb5b5bd4a54e6021e9bbfdf60221d8d7c2833c3

[5] Sakaridis I, Ellis R, Cawthraw S, et al. Investigating the Association Between the Caecal Microbiomes of Broilers and Campylobacter Burden. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1569ba455b71b11276e3aab844d94d4133f27d67

[6] Swaggerty C, Pevzner I, He H, et al. Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens more resistant to Campylobacter jejuni. Poultry Science. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/831b6a5a4a238d50cd1bef5308eca09bd58a19ef

[7] Konkel M, Talukdar PK, Negretti N, et al. Taking Control: Campylobacter jejuni Binding to Fibronectin Sets the Stage for Cellular Adherence and Invasion. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3664a1f99a31a4dc9cb4cb3929805668b11ab6a

[8] CAMPYLOBACTER: A BRIEF REVIEW OF ITS CAUSES, DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES AND PREVENTION. Vol 3 Issue 2. 2022. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/735841adbaa3927d3ac1fb1f53403eb410638a48

[9] Epping L, Antão EM, Semmler T. Population Biology and Comparative Genomics of Campylobacter Species. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c24dc8321496e9827c4786c66ec93c37819ed31d

[10] Ghatak S, He Y, Reed S, et al. Whole genome sequencing and analysis of Campylobacter coli YH502 from retail chicken reveals a plasmid-borne type VI secretion system. Genomics Data. 2017. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eade57d8804dcc84897250615489e929fd5d0c64

[11] Wallace RL, Cribb DM, Bulach D, et al. Campylobacter jejuni ST50, a pathogen of global importance: A comparative genomic analysis of isolates from Australia, Europe and North America. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bfa506e81c080cf870199a4e1db78241d927cf8

[12] Paravisi M, Laviniki V, Bassani J, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Brazilian Poultry Slaughterhouses. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7ba09c2dbd19eb85c8cabb4d4ecaeae26a0cfd5

[13] Jayasekara M, Dilan A. Review on the scenario of Campylobacter in Malaysia. Letters in Food Research. 2025. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec0962d3d3727e3d3c886794564c7f92a42f8024

[14] Suleman D, Zulfiqar S, Alarcón Rojo AD, et al. ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7 IN MEAT AND POULTRY: TRANSMISSION, CONSEQUENCES ON HUMAN HEALTH AND IMPACT OF NON-THERMAL DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGIES: A REVIEW. Agricultural sciences journal. 2022. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7e38e9dcd33f2a78af7c066d66f92c9dc6c49ec

[15] Abd El-Ghany WA. Helicobacter pullorum: A potential hurdle emerging pathogen for public health. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cc752777a69b8cbcd5ba0fe2a3c5414ce1b7416

[16] Ngan WY, Rao S, Chan L, et al. Impacts of Wet Market Modernization Levels and Hygiene Practices on the Microbiome and Microbial Safety of Wooden Cutting Boards in Hong Kong. Microorganisms. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bf0a7321c9d131363e13918c64660217e92d7e5

[17] Adams LJ, Zeng X, Lin J. Development and Evaluation of Two Live Salmonella-Vectored Vaccines for Campylobacter Control in Broiler Chickens. Foodborne pathogens and disease. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3eb516ea7d69d032d5d645a01496880fc523aca

[18] Mortada M, Cosby D, Shanmugasundaram R, et al. In vivo and in vitro assessment of commercial probiotic and organic acid feed additives in broilers challenged with Campylobacter coli. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/047645f918894551d5b212b5bd28bb2ebf50275d

[19] Ahn D, Kim I, Lee E. Irradiation and additive combinations on the pathogen reduction and quality of poultry meat. Poultry Science. 2013. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40a7ad29454d328d034a693a25e6a10740a9dd71

[20] Arsi K, Donoghue A, Venkitanarayanan K, et al. The Efficacy of the natural plant extracts, thymol and carvacrol against campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens. 2014. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb25ffc13a9af2deecc7130a8afe5797f435108

[21] Wang H, Li Y, Slavik M. Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Salmonella and Campylobacter in Poultry Samples Using Quantum Dots Based Fluorescent Immunoassay Coupled with Magnetic Immunoseparation. 2014. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eb49065bd97ae583bf4e6c7563108361fe1097

[22] Islam M, Martinez-Soto CE, Lin JT, et al. A systematic review from basics to omics on bacteriophage applications in poultry production and processing. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9f44837665ded8fe3a9e0955e6a65eef865dfb6

[23] Mor-Mur M, Yuste J. Emerging Bacterial Pathogens in Meat and Poultry: An Overview. 2009. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dd7333be21ba4f59ae8c13e47f30ae80b816188

[24] Meat-Associated Pathogens of Recent Concern. 2003. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efc870ca9285f322116311f737f2abbf9b2e099a

[25] Hochberg N, Bhadelia N. Infections Associated with Exotic Cuisine: The Dangers of Delicacies. Microbiology spectrum. 2015. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/090ada5d68630bda754bd46799f165d6877bec72

[26] Kosa K, Cates S, Bradley S, et al. Consumer-reported handling of raw poultry products at home: results from a national survey. Journal of Food Protection. 2015. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fec2731d47db7bc7fabec58c8f090d7d51db3db9

[27] Oyarzabal O, Backert S. Control of Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Production. 2016. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11055dbb12d1c4459beab7c75688ce1620379583

[28] Lopes G, Ramires T, Kleinubing N, et al. Virulence factors of foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5a5a7971f22ced66c883c9f27c84359bc3c676b

[29] Vandeplas S, Dauphin RD, Beckers Y, et al. Salmonella in chicken: current and developing strategies to reduce contamination at farm level. Journal of Food Protection. 2010. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b759084379b72d0c431dbecd652f2848e1bbf4b

[30] Doyle MP. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and its significance in foods. Journal of food microbiology. 1991. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/126353225faa8db80885cb66bb4f44cbed7b4224

[31] Keller JI, Shriver WG. PREVALENCE OF THREE CAMPYLOBACTER SPECIES, C. JEJUNI, C. COLI, AND C. LARI, USING MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING