Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in Poultry: Avian Tuberculosis – Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Control

Introduction

Avian tuberculosis (ATB) is a chronic, contagious, and granulomatous disease of poultry and wild birds caused primarily by Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium (MAA) [1, 2]. This pathogen is a member of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), which also includes M. avium subsp. hominissuis (MAH), M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), and M. avium subsp. silvaticum (MAS) [3, 29]. MAA is characterized genotypically by the presence of the insertion element IS901 and the absence of IS900, which distinguishes it from MAP [4, 3]. The disease is classified as a List B disease by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) and remains a significant concern for backyard flocks, zoo aviaries, and captive bird collections, although its prevalence in intensively managed commercial poultry has declined due to improved biosecurity [1, 2].

This review provides a detailed examination of the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and control strategies for MAA infection in poultry, with a focus on the molecular and biophysical mechanisms underlying the host-pathogen interaction.

Etiology and Taxonomy

Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium is an acid-fast, aerobic, non-spore-forming, slow-growing bacillus. The cell wall is rich in mycolic acids, which confer hydrophobicity, resistance to disinfectants, and the characteristic acid-fast staining property. The MAA reference strain DSM 44156 (ATCC 25291), originally isolated from a hen, has a genome size of approximately 4.96 Mb with a GC content of 69.28% [5].

The subspecies classification of M. avium is based on host tropism, insertion element profiles, and genomic differences. MAA is the primary pathogen of birds and carries IS901 and IS1245 [1, 3]. In contrast, MAH is more commonly isolated from humans and pigs and lacks IS901 [3, 58]. The insertion element IS901 is a critical diagnostic target, as its presence is considered confirmatory for MAA [4, 6].

Pathogenesis

Route of Infection and Dissemination

MAA is primarily transmitted via the fecal-oral route. Infected birds shed large numbers of bacilli in their feces, contaminating feed, water, and litter [2, 37]. Aerosol transmission is also possible, particularly in confined environments with high dust levels. The organism can survive for extended periods in the environment, including soil and bedding, due to its lipid-rich cell wall [7].

Following ingestion, MAA bacilli are taken up by intestinal macrophages via phagocytosis. The bacteria resist intracellular killing by inhibiting phagosome-lysosome fusion and acidification [51]. The mannosylated lipoarabinomannan (Man-LAM) of mycobacteria plays a key role in this process by activating the MAPK-p38 signaling pathway, which suppresses the host's ability to acidify the phagosome and promote phagolysosome maturation [51]. This allows MAA to replicate within macrophages, leading to the formation of granulomas.

Granuloma Formation

The hallmark lesion of ATB is the granuloma, a organized aggregate of epithelioid macrophages, multinucleated giant cells, and lymphocytes. Unlike mammalian tuberculosis, avian granulomas rarely calcify [1]. The granuloma serves as a physical barrier to contain the infection, but it also provides a protected niche for bacterial persistence. In birds, granulomas are most commonly found in the liver, spleen, and intestinal wall, while pulmonary lesions are uncommon [1, 8].

Clinical Signs

The clinical course of ATB is chronic and progressive. Infected birds may remain subclinical for months. As the disease advances, the following signs become apparent:

• Chronic wasting: Progressive weight loss despite a normal appetite is a cardinal sign [1, 8].
• Diarrhea: Intermittent or persistent diarrhea is common, often leading to dehydration.
• Depression and lethargy: Birds become less active and may isolate themselves from the flock.
• Lameness: Joint involvement or bone marrow granulomas can cause lameness [8, 9].
• Decreased egg production: In laying flocks, egg production drops significantly [8].
• Mortality: Mortality is typically low but cumulative, with death occurring due to cachexia or secondary infections.

In a documented outbreak in a commercial turkey breeder flock, morbidity reached 91.6% and mortality 80%, with clinical signs including progressive weight loss, decreased egg production, listlessness, and lameness [8].

Gross and Microscopic Lesions

Gross Pathology

At necropsy, the most consistent findings are multiple, discrete, yellowish-white nodules (tubercles) in the liver and spleen. These nodules range from 1 mm to several centimeters in diameter. The liver and spleen are often enlarged and may have a mottled appearance. Intestinal lesions, particularly in the duodenum and jejunum, appear as thickened, nodular areas. Bone marrow, especially the femur, may contain caseous material [9, 6]. In contrast to mammalian tuberculosis, the lungs are rarely affected [1].

Microscopic Pathology

Histologically, the granulomas consist of a central core of caseous necrosis surrounded by epithelioid macrophages, Langhans-type giant cells, and a peripheral rim of lymphocytes and plasma cells. Acid-fast bacilli are readily demonstrated within the cytoplasm of macrophages and giant cells using Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining [9, 62]. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anti-mycobacterial antibodies can provide superior sensitivity for detecting bacilli in tissue sections compared to ZN staining alone [62].

Diagnosis

A definitive diagnosis of ATB requires a multimodal approach combining clinical evaluation, pathology, microbiology, and molecular biology.

Acid-Fast Staining

The Ziehl-Neelsen stain is the most rapid and cost-effective method for detecting mycobacteria in tissue smears or fecal samples. The presence of red, beaded rods against a blue background is indicative of mycobacteria. However, this method cannot differentiate MAA from other mycobacterial species and has limited sensitivity, particularly in samples with low bacterial loads [1, 62].

Mycobacterial Culture

Culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis. MAA is a slow-growing organism, requiring 4 to 8 weeks of incubation at 37 degrees Celsius on selective media such as Löwenstein-Jensen or Middlebrook 7H11 agar [6, 37]. Colonies are typically smooth, domed, and off-white. Culture allows for subsequent molecular characterization but is time-consuming and requires a Biosafety Level 2 laboratory.

Molecular Diagnostics

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has revolutionized the diagnosis of ATB by providing rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of MAA. The primary targets are the insertion elements IS901 and IS1245 [4, 6].

• Conventional PCR: Multiplex PCR assays targeting IS901 and IS1245 can simultaneously confirm the presence of M. avium and differentiate MAA (IS901+) from MAH (IS901-) [10, 4].
• Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR): Triplex qPCR assays targeting IS901, IS1245, and a host gene (e.g., 18S rRNA) allow for quantification of bacterial load and internal control validation. qPCR has been shown to be faster and more reliable than culture for detecting MAA in tissue samples [6].
• Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): LAMP assays targeting IS901 have been developed for rapid, field-deployable detection of MAA. This method does not require a thermocycler and can produce results in under one hour [11].

Genotyping and Molecular Epidemiology

For epidemiological investigations, several genotyping methods have been employed:

• IS901 RFLP: Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis using IS901 as a probe provides a high-resolution fingerprint of MAA strains. This method has been used to trace outbreaks and identify sources of infection [12, 13, 14, 15].
• MIRU-VNTR: Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing offers a PCR-based alternative to RFLP. Studies have shown that MAA isolates from birds exhibit a high degree of homogeneity by MIRU-VNTR, in contrast to the heterogeneity seen in MAH isolates [43, 30].
• Whole genome sequencing (WGS): WGS provides the ultimate resolution for phylogenetic analysis. The complete genome of MAA strain HJW, isolated from a cow, was found to be 4.96 Mb and most closely related to strain DSM 44156 [16].

Serology

Serological tests, such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have been developed for detecting antibodies against MAA in birds. However, the humoral response in avian mycobacteriosis is variable and often weak, limiting the sensitivity of serological assays [17]. The use of specific antigens, such as the MPB70 protein, has been explored but is not yet standard.

Diagnostic Algorithm

The following Mermaid diagram outlines a recommended diagnostic workflow for suspected ATB in poultry.

flowchart TD
    A[Suspected ATB: Chronic wasting, diarrhea, granulomas at necropsy], > B{Clinical history & gross lesions}
    B, > C[Collect liver, spleen, intestinal tissue & feces]
    C, > D[Ziehl-Neelsen staining of smears]
    D, > E{Acid-fast rods present?}
    E, >|Yes| F[Proceed to molecular confirmation]
    E, >|No| G[Consider culture or qPCR if suspicion remains high]
    F, > H[DNA extraction & PCR for IS901 and IS1245]
    H, > I{IS901 positive?}
    I, >|Yes| J[Confirmed MAA infection]
    I, >|No| K[Consider MAH or other mycobacteria]
    J, > L[Optional: Genotyping by IS901 RFLP or MIRU-VNTR for epidemiology]
    L, > M[Implement control measures: quarantine, culling, biosecurity]

Differential Diagnosis

ATB must be differentiated from other causes of chronic wasting and granulomatous disease in poultry. Key differentials include:

• Infectious Coryza: Caused by Avibacterium paragallinarum, this disease presents with facial swelling and respiratory signs, not granulomatous lesions in the liver or spleen.
• Fowl Cholera: Caused by Pasteurella multocida, this acute disease presents with septicemia and focal necrosis, not chronic granulomas.
• Necrotic Enteritis: Caused by Clostridium perfringens, this condition is acute and affects the intestinal tract without systemic granulomas.
• Avian Chlamydiosis (Psittacosis): Caused by Chlamydia psittaci, this disease can cause hepatosplenomegaly but typically presents with respiratory and ocular signs.
• Escherichia coli infections: Colibacillosis can cause granulomatous lesions (coligranuloma) but is usually associated with airsacculitis and pericarditis.

Zoonotic Risk

MAA is considered an opportunistic zoonotic pathogen. While it rarely causes disease in immunocompetent humans, it can cause disseminated infections in immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV/AIDS or undergoing immunosuppressive therapy [1, 2]. The primary route of human infection is through the consumption of undercooked contaminated meat or via inhalation of aerosols from infected birds [6]. The presence of MAA in muscle tissue of infected hens has been documented, underscoring the risk to immunosuppressed individuals who consume undercooked poultry [6]. Multidrug-resistant MAA strains have been isolated from domestic birds, raising public health concerns [18].

Control and Eradication

Treatment of ATB in poultry is not recommended due to the chronic nature of the disease, the difficulty in achieving bacterial clearance, and the risk of antimicrobial resistance. Multidrug therapy with azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol has been attempted in pet birds with limited success [19, 46]. Control strategies focus on prevention, biosecurity, and eradication.

Biosecurity

• Quarantine: New birds should be quarantined for at least 60 days and tested before introduction to the flock.
• Sanitation: Regular cleaning and disinfection of housing, feeders, and waterers is essential. MAA is resistant to many common disinfectants; phenolic compounds and glutaraldehyde are more effective.
• Rodent and wild bird control: Wild birds, particularly pigeons and sparrows, can serve as reservoirs and introduce MAA into poultry flocks [8, 7]. Rodents can mechanically transmit the bacteria.
• Litter management: Removal of contaminated litter and soil is critical, as MAA can persist in the environment for years.

Eradication

In infected flocks, the most effective control measure is depopulation. All birds in the affected flock should be culled, and the premises should be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. A rest period of at least 6 to 12 months is recommended before restocking with MAA-free birds [2].

Vaccination

There is no commercially available vaccine for ATB in poultry. Research into vaccine development is ongoing, with efforts focused on live attenuated strains or subunit vaccines targeting immunogenic proteins [2]. The development of an effective vaccine remains a significant challenge due to the complex immune response required to control intracellular mycobacterial infections.

Antimicrobial Resistance

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) MAA strains is a growing concern. Isolates from domestic birds in Egypt were found to be resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline, and harbored the resistance genes inhA, rpoB, rpsL, and otrB [18]. Similarly, a wild otter isolate showed resistance to multiple drugs, suggesting circulation of MDR strains in the environment [20]. This highlights the need for prudent antimicrobial use and ongoing surveillance.

Conclusion

Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium remains a significant pathogen in poultry, particularly in non-commercial and captive settings. The chronic, progressive nature of avian tuberculosis, combined with the pathogen's ability to persist in the environment and its zoonotic potential, necessitates robust diagnostic and control strategies. Molecular methods, particularly PCR targeting IS901, have greatly improved diagnostic accuracy and speed. Eradication through depopulation and strict biosecurity remains the cornerstone of control. Continued research into vaccine development and antimicrobial resistance surveillance is essential to mitigate the impact of this disease on poultry health and public health.

References

[1] Dhama K, Mahendran M, Tiwari R, et al. Tuberculosis in Birds: Insights into the Mycobacterium avium Infections. Veterinary Medicine International. 2011. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0261a20123380b562ad2cee550ff3a0f21b91de9

[2] Puspitasari Y, Khairullah A, Raharjo H, et al. Current perspectives on avian tuberculosis in domestic and wild birds: Molecular diagnostics, genomic surveillance, and vaccination challenges. Open Veterinary Journal. 2026. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0aa1437cd300cf5dac91db28757b44cdbb549c24

[3] Mijs W, de Haas P, Rossau R, et al. Molecular evidence to support a proposal to reserve the designation Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium for bird-type isolates and 'M. avium* subsp. hominissuis' for the human/porcine type of M. avium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e92052240171e1de2d271e6a92895322ade4fcd

[4] Svastova P, Pavlik I, Bartoš M. Rapid differentiation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by amplification of insertion element IS901. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06e38bef33332c681e2ee5104ec9cd1760bbb0eb

[5] Goethe R, Laarmann K, Spröer C, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium Chester (DSM 44156). Microbiology Resource Announcements. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d31123be1d55ed5b02deb83f1011b0c63c6ac9c

[6] Kaevská M, Slana I, Kralik P, et al. Examination of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium distribution in naturally infected hens by culture and triplex quantitative real time PCR. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2928ed4a986530d2201746029318cfcbad1be21

[7] Moravkova M, Lamka J, Kříž P, et al. The presence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) living in captivity and in other birds, vertebrates, non-vertebrates and the environment. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8d517e9ad4b39f7b0a1536d8b45a8c14a08d1bb

[8] Salamatian I, Ghaniei A, Mosavari N, et al. Outbreak of avian mycobacteriosis in a commercial turkey breeder flock. Avian Pathology. 2020. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/298e2fbbc7576cff3586177882df632d41276beb

[9] Tsiouris V, Kiskinis K, Mantzios T, et al. Avian Mycobacteriosis and Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium avium Subsp. avium in Racing Pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Greece. Animals. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cedc027cf1a4fc2bcec75b7d1fa5690ef8293bc

[10] Kříž P, Slana I, Mrlík V, et al. Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in domestic pigeons (Columba livia f. domestica) diagnosed by direct conventional multiplex PCR: a case report. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/417bcfad4acbde2d11c07d6c88b50358d0b2ab82

[11] Yashiki N, Yamazaki Y, Subangkit M, et al. Development of a LAMP assay for rapid and sensitive detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and subsp. hominissuis. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2019. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab288216aae41e3ffb94df461cdcb19cd4502a35

[12] Pate M, Moravkova M, Krt B, et al. Genotyping of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium isolates from domestic animals in Slovenia by IS901 RFLP. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/392947b0d229876385d8d6db9a6467a19dd25b71

[13] Špičić S, Cvetnić Ž, Duvnjak S, et al. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium from animals in Croatia using IS901 RFLP and MIRU-VNTR typing. 2010. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e471335d6980829a1c02586024fc1e60429f619

[14] Pate M, Krt B, Cvetnić Ž, et al. Retrospective IS901 RFLP Analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium Isolates from Domestic Animals. 2007. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e82cf0b4d38cffdb0036d6947fcbb56b570a3bf

[15] Moravkova M, Bartoš M, Dvorska-Bartosova L, et al. Genetic variability of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium of pig isolates. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89174a02cecd56cb0b39c5496c6eaf5555b385fd

[16] Bao Y, Yang T, Zhang H, et al. Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium Strain Isolated from Cow. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2023. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f4fe925efc457a0500569266261bb4b6799cd58

[17] Gray P, Saggese M, Phalen D, et al. Humoral response to Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in naturally infected ring-neck doves (Streptopelia risoria). Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2008. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5abb6d312c883418f000dc87ff9334ddc2d4a443

[18] Algammal A, Hashem HR, Al-otaibi AS, et al. Emerging MDR-Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in house-reared domestic birds as the first report in Egypt. BMC Microbiology. 2021. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bde9fe59c765239af73563c45cf4e805951f781

[19] Saggese M, Tizard I, Gray P, et al. Evaluation of Multidrug Therapy With Azithromycin, Rifampin, and Ethambutol for the Treatment of Mycobacterium avium subsp avium in Ring-neck Doves (Streptopelia risoria): An Uncontrolled Clinical Study. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery. 2014. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8a4f0f7c55919bccf0ee4c98d6216849b536905

[20] Reil I, Duvnjak S, Špičić S, et al. Isolation of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Avium from a Wild Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra). Antibiotics. 2024. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f03c17d0949a21e0d1cdcc0ab23775c38a5f583

[21] Ocepek M, Pate M, Žolnir-dovč M, et al. Tuberculosis in cattle caused by IS901+ Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium - a case report. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73b681deee36522d571addbd42bfa5260e5931e7

[22] Macovei I, Cochard T, Pavel I, et al. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by MIRU-VNTR typing. 2013. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f7133771dec7e922f40be65d5f71565a41392a4

[23] Dvorská L, Mátlová L, Ayele WY, et al. Avian tuberculosis in naturally infected captive water birds of the Ardeideae and Threskiornithidae families studied by serotyping, IS901 RFLP typing, and virulence for poultry. Veterinary Microbiology. 2007. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/483b2f5e0e0bac0f3029db396c14f2f67e6ff728

[24] Ikonomopoulos J, Fragkiadaki E, Liandris E, et al. Estimation of the spread of pathogenic mycobacteria in organic broiler farms by the polymerase chain reaction. Veterinary Microbiology. 2009. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00d28df52e821f05b40c2fdb432e964e19f578b7

[25] Pavlik I, Jahn P, Moravkova M, et al. Lung tuberculosis in a horse caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium of serotype 2: a case report. 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4692bc863a115e8f1c46153dcbd710cc1f828fd

[26] Kříž P, Kaevská M, Slana I, et al. Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium in lymph nodes and diaphragms of pigs from one infected herd in the Czech Republic. Journal of Food Protection. 2014. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e4c250f8873cfe9a60bb5125a96075103237077

[27] Marsh I, Whittington RJ, Cousins D. PCR-restriction endonuclease analysis for identification and strain typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium based on polymorphisms in IS1311. Molecular and Cellular Probes. 1999. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a950e4751be3418e21ec33c2d9876afd526601fb

[28] Yong H, Choi GE, Lee B, et al. Disseminated Infection Due to Mycobacterium avium Subsp. avium in an Asian Elephant (Elephas maximus). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 2011. URL: https://www.semanticscholar